Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29404626›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2018

Direct dose correlation of MRI morphologic alterations of healthy liver tissue after robotic liver SBRT.

Judit Boda-Heggemann, Anika Jahnke, Mark K H Chan, Leila S Ghaderi Ardekani, Peter Hunold, Jost Philipp Schäfer, Stefan Huttenlocher, Stefan Wurster, Dirk Rades, Guido Hildebrandt and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Radiomics for liver tumours.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Review
  10. Stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a multimodal treatment setting.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Judit Boda-HeggemannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany. judit.boda-heggemann@umm.de.
Anika JahnkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Mark K H ChanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Leila S Ghaderi ArdekaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Peter HunoldDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Jost Philipp SchäferDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Stefan HuttenlocherSaphir Radiosurgery Center, Güstrow, Germany.
Stefan WursterSaphir Radiosurgery Center, Güstrow, Germany.
Dirk RadesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Guido HildebrandtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Frank LohrUO di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Oncologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Jürgen DunstDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Frederik WenzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Oliver BlanckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor assessing healthy liver reactions after robotic SBRT (stereotactic body radiotherapy), we investigated early morphologic alterations on MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) with respect to patient and treatment plan parameters. PATIENTS AND

methodsMRI data at 6-17 weeks post-treatment from 22 patients with 42 liver metastases were analyzed retrospectively. Median prescription dose was 40 Gy delivered in 3-5 fractions. T2- and T1-weighted MRI were registered to the treatment plan. Absolute doses were converted to EQD2 (Equivalent dose in 2Gy fractions) with α/β-ratios of 2 and 3 Gy for healthy, and 8 Gy for modelling pre-damaged liver tissue.

resultsSharply defined, centroid-shaped morphologic alterations were observed outside the high-dose volume surrounding the GTV. On T2-w MRI, hyperintensity at EQD2 isodoses of 113.3 ± 66.1 Gy

conclusionsEarly post-treatment changes in healthy liver tissue after robotic SBRT could spatially be correlated to respective isodoses. Median nominal doses of 10.1-11.3 Gy per fraction (EQD2 79-97 Gy

Indexed as

LiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiotherapy DosageAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansLiver Function TestsLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRadiation InjuriesRadiosurgeryRetrospective StudiesCyberKnifeLiver metastasesMRINormal tissue reactionsSBRT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.