Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29404424›Full record

ArticlemSystems

Signatures of Selection at Drug Resistance Loci in

Tatum D Mortimer, Alexandra M Weber, Caitlin S Pepperell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hit Compounds and Associated Targets in IntracellularMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Gene evolutionary trajectories inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Genome-wide analysis inMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Genome analyses of 174 strains ofMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tatum D MortimerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6255-690X
Alexandra M WeberDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Caitlin S PepperellDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6324-1333
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

GRADUATE TRAINING IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCEST32GM007215 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HULL, CHRISTINA M · 1985 to 2018
$22.5M
University of Michigan Training Program in Genomic ScienceT32HG000040 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sebastian Zoellner · 1995 to 2026
$16.4M
Drifting to victory: resolving the paradox of M.tuberculosis evolutionR01AI113287 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Caitlin S Pepperell · 2015 to 2026
$6.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000040NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI113287NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death by an infectious disease, and global TB control efforts are increasingly threatened by drug resistance in

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceevolutiongenomicsMycobacterium tuberculosispositive selection

Identifiers

PMID29404424
PMCPMC5790871
OpenAlexW2950988122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.