ArticleTurkish thoracic journal2016
Can a Computer-Based Prescription of Free Medication Increase Smoking Cessation Rates Efficiently?
Article in Turkish thoracic journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tobacco cessation programs and factors associated with their effectiveness in the Middle East: A systematic review.Tobacco induced diseases · 2022Review
- Providing Free Access to Smoking Cessation Medications: Does It Have an Impact on the Treatment Adherence and Success of Smoking Cessation?Turkish thoracic journal · 2021Article
- Comparative Analysis of Three Different Drug Distribution Schemes for Smoking Cessation.Turkish thoracic journal · 2021Article
- Comparative assessment of outcomes of smoking cessation therapies and role of free medications in successful long-term abstinence.Tobacco induced diseases · 2021Article
- How does reimbursement status affect smoking cessation interventions? A real-life experience from the Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey.Tobacco induced diseases · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn 2011, in the context of a research project, bupropion and varenicline were distributed to smoking cessation clinics by the Ministry of Health of Turkey to be prescribed free of charge by a computer-based system. In the present study, we compared smoking cessation rates between patients who were prescribed free medications during the period of the project and those who had to pay for their medication. MATERIAL AND
methodsSix hundred four patients who applied during the project period were given either bupropion or varenicline, which were prescribed using an algorithm-based computer system. Three hundred sixteen patients who applied after that period were prescribed medicines deemed appropriate by the attending physician but had to pay for the medication on their own. Follow-up visits were arranged for one year. Carbon monoxide (CO) levels in the expired air were used as indicators of cessation.
resultsA total of 537 patients began treatment, of which 438 (81.6%) applied during the first period (group 1) and 99 (18.4%) applied during the second period (group 2). The mean age and concomitant disease presence were higher in the second-period patients (p< 0.05). Advanced age, comorbidities, pathological findings in spirometry, and chest X-ray were also higher in those who paid for the cost of their treatment (p= 0.009, 0.001, 0.006, 0.001, respectively). Smoking cessation rates were found to be 14.8% and 27.3% after six months (p= 0.008) and 10.7% and 18.2% after one year (p= 0.059), respectively, for group 1 and group 2. Age, dependence score, cigarettes smoked (as pack-years), and percentage of patients who paid for the treatment were found to be significantly higher (p< 0.001, 0.021, 0.018, 0.001, respectively) for those who quit smoking at the end of six months. For the patients who quit smoking at the end of one year, age was found to be significantly higher (p= 0.008), and the number of males was higher, although the difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.05). When logistic regression analysis was applied, age, dependence score, and paid treatment were found to be independent variables (p= 0.002, 0.008, 0.012, respectively) for those who quit smoking at the end of six months. Only age was found to be an independent variable for those who quit smoking at the end of one year (p= 0.029).
conclusionMore smokers could receive treatment by the distribution of free drugs. However, quitting rates at the end of six months were higher when patients had to pay for their treatment. On the other hand, quitting rates at the end of one year were not affected by whether the treatment was paid for or free of charge. The most important factor increasing quitting rates at the end of six months and one year was found to be advanced age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.