ArticleTurkish thoracic journal2015
Eosinophilic Lung Disease: Accompanied with 12 Cases.
Article in Turkish thoracic journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesEosinophilic lung diseases are a rare group of heterogeneous diseases characterized by the increase of the eosinophil ratio in airways and lung parenchyma. In our clinic, patients diagnosed with eosinophilic lung disease were evaluated with their clinical features and prognoses. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn our clinic, 12 cases that were diagnosed and followed up for eosinophilic lung disease [eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA, Churg-Strauss syndrome) (n=4), chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP) (n=7), and simple pulmonary eosinophilia (Löffler's syndrome) (n=1)] were retrospectively evaluated.
resultsOf the 12 cases, 8 were females, and the average age was 43 (28-72) years. All cases were undergoing bronchodilator therapy with asthma diagnosis (2 months-40 years). Additionally, 4 of the cases had sinusitis, and 1 had allergic rhinitis. The most common complaints of the patients were difficulty in breathing and coughing, and the duration of complaints was a median of 2 months. Peripheral eosinophilia and total IgE elevation were present during the admission of all cases; additionally, leucocyte elevation was recorded in 10 of them, anemia in 4 of them, and thrombocytosis in 4 of them. Moreover, 43% of the recorded DLCO values were lower than normal. Of the 10 cases that underwent bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), the eosinophil ratio was above 25% in 7 subjects. Of the 8 cases that underwent transbronchial biopsy, eosinophil-involving infiltration was detected in 6 subjects. Additional findings in cases diagnosed with EGPA were nasal polyposis (n=1), sinusitis (n=2), polyneuropathy (n=1), cardiac involvement (n=2), and skin involvement in biopsy (n=1). Spontaneous recovery was observed in the patient diagnosed with simple pulmonary eosinophilia during the follow-up that was performed based on the history and laboratory and BAL results of the patient. Prednisolone treatment was started for all cases, except for simple pulmonary eosinophilia, and their controls were performed. Relapse was observed in eight cases (EGPA: 4, CEP: 4); during the relapse treatment of one case diagnosed with EGPA, exitus occurred. One case rejected treatment despite the presence of peripheral eosinophilia, and the other cases are being followed-up without medication.
conclusionGiven that the clinical pictures in pulmonary eosinophilia syndromes are on a wide spectrum, a specific diagnosis is important. Progression may differ in each patient, and a close follow-up is necessary during and after the treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.