Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29403965›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2016

Methods for

Mounyr Balouiri, Moulay Sadiki, Saad Koraichi Ibnsouda

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03812315 (Antimicrobial Effect OF Propolis Administrated Through Two Different Vehicles In High Caries Risk Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 1,924 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,924citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03812315 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Antimicrobial Effect OF Propolis Administrated Through Two Different Vehicles In High Caries Risk Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNourhan M.AlyRan2017 to 2019Enrolled60ConditionsEarly Childhood CariesArmsPropolis chewing gum, Propolis mouthwash
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,924 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1,864 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mounyr BalouiriLaboratory of Microbial Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, B.P. 2202 Imouzzer Road, Fez, Morocco.
Moulay SadikiLaboratory of Microbial Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, B.P. 2202 Imouzzer Road, Fez, Morocco.
Saad Koraichi IbnsoudaLaboratory of Microbial Biotechnology, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, B.P. 2202 Imouzzer Road, Fez, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in researching and developing new antimicrobial agents from various sources to combat microbial resistance. Therefore, a greater attention has been paid to antimicrobial activity screening and evaluating methods. Several bioassays such as disk-diffusion, well diffusion and broth or agar dilution are well known and commonly used, but others such as flow cytofluorometric and bioluminescent methods are not widely used because they require specified equipment and further evaluation for reproducibility and standardization, even if they can provide rapid results of the antimicrobial agent's effects and a better understanding of their impact on the viability and cell damage inflicted to the tested microorganism. In this review article, an exhaustive list of

Indexed as

Agar diffusion methodAntimicrobial gradient methodThin-layer chromatography (TLC)–bioautographyTime-kill test

Identifiers

PMID29403965
PMCPMC5762448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.