Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29403545›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2018

Bevacizumab in temozolomide refractory high-grade gliomas: single-centre experience and review of the literature.

Jennifer Jeck, Rebecca Kassubek, Jan Coburger, Simone Edenhofer, Stefan S Schönsteiner, Albert C Ludolph, Bernd Schmitz, Jens Engelke, Regine Mayer-Steinacker, Jan Lewerenz and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer JeckDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany.
Rebecca KassubekDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University and RKU - University and Rehabilitation Clinics Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Jan CoburgerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany.
Simone EdenhoferDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany.
Stefan S SchönsteinerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany.
Albert C LudolphDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University and RKU - University and Rehabilitation Clinics Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Bernd SchmitzDepartment of Neuroradiology, Ulm University/Bezirkskrankenhaus Guenzburg, Guenzburg, Germany.
Jens EngelkeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany.
Regine Mayer-SteinackerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany.
Jan LewerenzDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University and RKU - University and Rehabilitation Clinics Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Lars BullingerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University Medical Centre, Ulm, Germany; Medical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DEUniversity and Rehabilitation Clinics Ulm · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite multidisciplinary treatment approaches, the prognosis for patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) is poor, with a median overall survival (OS) of 14.6 months for glioblastoma multiforme (GB). As high levels of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF) are found in HGG, targeted anti-antiangiogenic therapy using the humanized monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (BEV) was studied in a series of clinical trials. Still, the discrepancy of BEV's efficacy with regard to initial clinical and radiological response and its reported failure to prolong survival remains to be explained. Here, we illustrate the effectiveness of BEV in recurrent HGG by summarizing our single-centre experience.

methodsWe have retrospectively investigated the effect of BEV in temozolomide refractory HGG in 39 patients treated at the University Hospital of Ulm, Germany.

resultsMedian duration of BEV treatment was 12.5 weeks; 23% of patients received BEV for more than 6 months and 15% for more than 1 year, until clinical or radiological tumour progression led to discontinuation. Furthermore, Karnofsky performance status increased in 30.6% and steroid dose decreased in 39% of all patients.

conclusionsThe review of literature reveals that phase II and III studies support BEV as an effective therapy in recurrent HGG, at least with regard to progression-free survival (PFS), but landmark phase III trials failed to prove benefit concerning OS. Here, we discuss reasons that may account for this observation. We conclude that prolonging PFS with maintenance of neurological function and personal and economic independency justifies the off-label use of BEV.

Indexed as

bevacizumabglioblastomahigh-grade gliomatemozolomideVEGF

Identifiers

PMID29403545
PMCPMC5791550
OpenAlexW2793304380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.