ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2018
When myasthenia gravis is deemed refractory: clinical signposts and treatment strategies.
Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 119 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
119 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 211 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Management of Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Muscle & nerve · 2026Pooled it
- Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Various Monoclonal Antibodies in Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of complement inhibitors and FcRn blockers in generalized AChR antibody-positive myasthenia gravis: a meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Myasthenia Gravis With Acetylcholine Receptor Antibodies in the Very Old: Treatment Challenges and Diagnostic Pitfalls.European journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Health economic evaluations of myasthenia gravis: a systematic review.Croatian medical journal · 2026Pooled it
- Telitacicept in myasthenia gravis: a systematic review of clinical outcomes, steroid-sparing effects, and safety.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapies in Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Transfer of monoclonal antibodies into breastmilk in neurologic and non-neurologic diseases.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2020Pooled it
- ADAPT NXT: Fixed Cycles or Every-Other-Week IV Efgartigimod in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Trial
- Long-term efficacy of eculizumab in refractory generalized myasthenia gravis: responder analyses.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2021Trial
- Economic burden of myasthenia gravis in France: A nationwide claims database study (STAMINA).The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Non-Cyclic Rozanolixizumab Administration in Complex Generalized Myasthenia Gravis.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
- Eculizumab in Myasthenia Gravis: A Multicenter Retrospective Real-World Study in China.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Ofatumumab Treatment for Refractory Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Post-Lung Adenocarcinoma Resection: A Case Report and Mechanistic Insight.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026Article
- Association Between Statin Initiation and Myasthenia Gravis Crisis.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Exploring psychosocial experiences in clinically stable generalised Myasthenia Gravis: A thematic analysis.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- An Exceptional Preaortic Ectopic Type B2 Thymoma as the Cause of Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Longitudinal treatment patterns in myasthenia gravis: An analysis from the prospective Dutch-Belgian patient registry.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Advancing Care in Myasthenia Gravis: What Can We Learn From the Multiple Sclerosis Community?Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2018
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognosis for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) has improved significantly over the past half century, including substantial reductions in mortality and morbidity. However, approximately 10% of patients fails to respond adequately to current therapies and are considered treatment refractory, or treatment intolerant, and up to 80% have disease that fails to achieve complete stable remission. Although patients with autoantibodies to muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (anti-MuSK positive) are more likely to become treatment refractory than those with autoantibodies to the acetylcholine receptor (anti-AChR positive), each of these serotypes is substantially represented in the refractory MG population. Other risk factors for becoming treatment refractory include history of thymoma or thymectomy and female sex. A modified treatment algorithm for MG is proposed: patients who have disease that fails to respond to the stepwise approach to therapy, are treatment intolerant, or who require chronic rescue measures despite ongoing therapy, should be considered treatment refractory and emerging therapies should be considered. Three emerging monoclonal antibody-based therapies are discussed: the anti-B-cell agent rituximab; the terminal complement activation inhibitor eculizumab; and belimumab, which targets B-cell activating factor. Increased understanding of molecular pathophysiology and accurate antibody subtyping in MG should lead to the use of new therapeutic agents and successful management of treatment-refractory patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.