Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29403344›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2017

The Influence of Study-Level Inference Models and Study Set Size on Coordinate-Based fMRI Meta-Analyses.

Han Bossier, Ruth Seurinck, Simone Kühn, Tobias Banaschewski, Gareth J Barker, Arun L W Bokde, Jean-Luc Martinot, Herve Lemaitre, Tomáš Paus, Sabina Millenet and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Han BossierDepartment of Data Analysis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ruth SeurinckDepartment of Data Analysis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Simone KühnDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Clinic, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Tobias BanaschewskiDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Gareth J BarkerDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Arun L W BokdeDiscipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jean-Luc MartinotInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, INSERM Unit 1000 Neuroimaging & Psychiatry, University Paris Sud - Paris Saclay, University Paris Descartes; and Maison de Solenn, Paris, France.
Herve LemaitreInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, INSERM Unit 1000 "Neuroimaging & Psychiatry", Faculté de médecine, Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; and Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Tomáš PausBaycrest and Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, Rotman Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sabina MillenetDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Beatrijs MoerkerkeDepartment of Data Analysis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

Training U54EB020403 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMPSON, PAUL M · 2014 to 2018
$10.1M
Axon, Testosterone and Mental Health during AdolescenceR01MH085772 · NIMH · BAYCREST CENTRE FOR GERIATRIC CARE · PI PAUS, TOMAS · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Medical Research Council MR/N000390/1Medical Research Council MR/N027558/1NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020403NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the increasing amount of neuroimaging studies, there is a growing need to summarize published results. Coordinate-based meta-analyses use the locations of statistically significant local maxima with possibly the associated effect sizes to aggregate studies. In this paper, we investigate the influence of key characteristics of a coordinate-based meta-analysis on (1) the balance between false and true positives and (2) the activation reliability of the outcome from a coordinate-based meta-analysis. More particularly, we consider the influence of the chosen group level model at the study level [fixed effects, ordinary least squares (OLS), or mixed effects models], the type of coordinate-based meta-analysis [Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) that only uses peak locations, fixed effects, and random effects meta-analysis that take into account both peak location and height] and the amount of studies included in the analysis (from 10 to 35). To do this, we apply a resampling scheme on a large dataset (

Indexed as

coordinate-based meta-analysisfMRIgroup modelingmixed effects modelsrandom effects modelsreliability

Identifiers

PMID29403344
PMCPMC5778144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.