Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29403314›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2018

Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes.

Melanie L Bell, Amy L Whitehead, Steven A Julious

13 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 13 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 140 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04158908 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Giving Information Systematically and Transparently in Lung and GI Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsCritical Illness, Oncology, CommunicationArmsOncolo-GIST
NCT04179305 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Giving Information Systematically and Transparently in Lung and GI Cancer Phase 2

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled37ConditionsCritical Illness, Oncology, CommunicationArmsOncolo-GIST, Usual Care Arm
NCT04735887 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of an Evidence-Informed Spinal Cord Injury Activities of Daily Living Educational Manual (SADL-eM): Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of StellenboschRan2021 to 2021Enrolled132ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsSADL-eM
NCT05405140 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Multiphasic Neuroplasticity Based Training Protocol With Shock Wave Therapy For Post Stroke Spasticity

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled32ConditionsStroke, Spasticity, MuscleArmsShock wave therapy with multiphasic neuroplasticity based training protocol, Conventional physical therapy
NCT05520671 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating TESLA-G, a Gamified, Telegram-delivered, Quizzing Platform for Surgical Education in Medical Students: a Protocol for a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanyang Technological UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsSurgical Education in Medical StudentsArmsGamified online quizzing platform, Conventional quizzing platform
NCT05745077 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Using Data to Achieve Surgical Health Equity in the Community

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsGallbladder DiseaseArmsTelemedicine Consultation, Traditional Care
NCT06314035 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

"Effects of a Decision Support Intervention on End-of-life Care Planning in Chinese Older Adults With Advanced Disease and Their Family Members: A Feasibility Trial"

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsCOPD Patient Decision Aid, General Health Coaching Intervention
NCT06485063 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Myofascial Reorganization on Running Performance, and Lower Limb Biomechanical, Viscoelastic, and Thermographic Properties of Triathletes: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of the State of Santa CatarinaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsHealthyArmsMyofascial Reorganization, PLACEBO Myofascial Reorganization
NCT06965296 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

AI-Enhanced App-based Intervention for Adolescent E-cigarette Cessation

TypeinterventionalSponsorState University of New York at BuffaloRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsNicotine Dependence, CigarettesArmsAI-enhanced smartphone app, AI-enhanced smartphone app, but with delayed access
NCT07177235 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Early Ketamine Plus Midazolam Versus Ketamine Plus Midazolam for the Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus

TypeinterventionalSponsorThomas Jefferson UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsRefractory Status EpilepticusArmsKetamine, Midazolam
NCT07639827 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Mental Fitness Intervention for Anesthesiology Resident Wellbeing and Self-Compassion

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsWellness, Self Compassion, Burnout, AnxietyArmsApp-based bundled mental fitness intervention, App-based wellness module collection
NCT07704749 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Rural Initiative for Inflammatory Screening & Engagement for Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorTexas Tech University Health Sciences CenterRan2026 to 2027Enrolled125ConditionsCardiometabolic Risk FactorsArmsRISE-W Micro-Movement Program
NCT07755839 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

CanCOG® - Cognitive Rehabilitation in Cancer: A Protocol for a Multicenter Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial With Non-central Nervous System Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorAveiro UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled60ConditionsCancer-related Cognitive Impairment, Cancer-related Cognitive Dysfunction, Cancer-related Cognitive Difficulties, Depression and Anxiety SymptomsArmsCanCOG® - Cogntive Rehabilitation in Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melanie L BellDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Amy L WhiteheadMedical Statistics Group, Design, Trials and Statistics, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Steven A JuliousMedical Statistics Group, Design, Trials and Statistics, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Teri L Bankhead · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA pilot study can be an important step in the assessment of an intervention by providing information to design the future definitive trial. Pilot studies can be used to estimate the recruitment and retention rates and population variance and to provide preliminary evidence of efficacy potential. However, estimation is poor because pilot studies are small, so sensitivity analyses for the main trial's sample size calculations should be undertaken.

methodsWe demonstrate how to carry out easy-to-perform sensitivity analysis for designing trials based on pilot data using an example. Furthermore, we introduce rules of thumb for the size of the pilot study so that the overall sample size, for both pilot and main trials, is minimized.

resultsThe example illustrates how sample size estimates for the main trial can alter dramatically by plausibly varying assumptions. Required sample size for 90% power varied from 392 to 692 depending on assumptions. Some scenarios were not feasible based on the pilot study recruitment and retention rates.

conclusionPilot studies can be used to help design the main trial, but caution should be exercised. We recommend the use of sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the design assumptions for a main trial.

Indexed as

feasibilitypilotpowerrandomized controlled trialsample sizesensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID29403314
PMCPMC5779280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 7 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.