Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29403268›Full record

Trial reportClinical interventions in aging2018

Different doses of steroid injection in elderly patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a triple-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Reza Salman Roghani, Mohammad Taghi Holisaz, Masoud Tarkashvand, Ahmad Delbari, Faeze Gohari, Andrea J Boon, Johan Lokk

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical interventions in aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Local corticosteroid injection versus placebo for carpal tunnel syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel injections.Radiology and oncology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Reza Salman RoghaniDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mohammad Taghi HolisazDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences.
Masoud TarkashvandDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences.
Ahmad DelbariResearch Center on Aging, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation, Tehran, Iran.
Faeze GohariPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.
Andrea J BoonDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Johan LokkDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences · IRKarolinska Institutet · SEMayo Clinic in Arizona · USShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is commonly seen in elderly populations, in part due to increased presence of predisposing comorbidities as well as physiological changes. We aimed at comparing the effectiveness of different doses of steroid using the ultrasound-guided hydrodissection method in elderly patients with CTS.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, triple-blind, randomized, controlled trial in elderly patients with CTS. Patients were allocated to one of three groups by simplified randomization. Groups I-III received 80 mg triamcinolone (2 mL) and 1 mL of 2% lidocaine; 40 mg triamcinolone (1 mL), 1 mL of 2% lidocaine, and 1 mL normal saline; and 1 mL of 2% lidocaine and 2 mL normal saline, respectively to make up to 3 mL volume. A wrist splint was then applied for support. Outcome measures included the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and median motor and sensory nerve conduction and its sonographic inlet cross-sectional area were used as objective measures. All data were recorded at baseline and 2, 12, and 24 weeks after injection. The investigators, patients, and statistician were blinded to the treatment assignment.

resultsIn total, 161 patients were recruited without statistically significant demographic differences between the three groups. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in any outcome, with the exception of the median distal motor latency, which was greater in Group II at all three follow-up visits, and significant baseline VAS difference between Groups I and III.

conclusionHydrodissection with lidocaine and normal saline is as effective as hydrodissection with low- and high-dose steroid medication in elderly patients with CTS in this study, but further studies with matched baseline measures and also a sham group are suggested for definitive recommendation.

Indexed as

Carpal Tunnel SyndromeWristAgedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansLidocaineMaleMiddle AgedNeural ConductionOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain MeasurementSplintsTreatment OutcomeTriamcinoloneAnti-Inflammatory AgentsLidocaineTriamcinolonecarpal tunnel syndromeelderlyhand painhydrodissectionparesthesiasteroid injectionultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID29403268
PMCPMC5779277
OpenAlexW2783410010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.