Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29403240›Full record

ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine

Only spinal fixation as treatment of prolapsed cervical intervertebral disc in patients presenting with myelopathy.

Atul Goel, Pralhad Dharurkar, Abhidha Shah, Sandeep Gore, Sandeep More, Shashi Ranjan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Is cervical instability the cause of lumbar canal stenosis?Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine
    Article
  5. "Only fixation": Can it be the single remedy for all?Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Atul GoelDepartment of Neurosurgery, KEM Hospital and Seth G S Medical College and Lilavati Hospital and Research Center, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Pralhad DharurkarDepartment of Neurosurgery, KEM Hospital and Seth G S Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Abhidha ShahDepartment of Neurosurgery, KEM Hospital and Seth G S Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sandeep GoreDepartment of Neurosurgery, KEM Hospital and Seth G S Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sandeep MoreDepartment of Neurosurgery, KEM Hospital and Seth G S Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Shashi RanjanDepartment of Neurosurgery, KEM Hospital and Seth G S Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Lilavati Hospital & Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimAn alternative form of surgical treatment of prolapsed cervical intervertebral disc in patients presenting with symptoms related to myelopathy is discussed. The treatment involved fixation of the affected spinal segments and aimed at arthrodesis. No direct manipulation or handling of the disc was done. MATERIALS AND

methodsDuring the period August 2010 to June 2017, 16 patients presenting with symptoms attributed to myelopathy and diagnosed to have prolapsed cervical intervertebral disc were surgically treated by spinal stabilization. There were 11 males and 5 females and their ages ranged from 20 to 66 years (average: 40.6 years). Apart from clinical and radiological indicators, the number of spinal segments that were stabilized depended on direct observation of facetal morphology, alignment, and stability. Surgery involved distraction-fixation of facets using Goel facet spacer (8 patients), transarticular facetal fixation (5 patients) using screws or a combination of both facetal spacer, and transarticular screws (3 patients).

resultsAll patients had "remarkable" clinical improvement in the immediate postoperative period as assessed by visual analog scale, Goel's clinical grading, and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 84 months (average: 50 months). The herniated disc regressed or disappeared at follow-up radiological assessment that ranged from 24 h to 3 months after surgery.

conclusionsSpinal segmental fixation aiming at arthrodesis with or without distraction of facets and without any direct surgical manipulation in the disc space or removal of the prolapsed portion of the disc can be considered in the armamentarium of the surgeon.

Indexed as

Facet distractionprolapsed intervertebral discsegmental arthrodesistransarticular fixation

Identifiers

PMID29403240
PMCPMC5763585
OpenAlexW2775933238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.