Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29403113›Full record

ReviewBulletin of the World Health Organization2018

Antibiotic distribution channels in Thailand: results of key-informant interviews, reviews of drug regulations and database searches.

Angkana Sommanustweechai, Sunicha Chanvatik, Varavoot Sermsinsiri, Somsajee Sivilaikul, Walaiporn Patcharanarumol, Shunmay Yeung, Viroj Tangcharoensathien

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Occurrence of Antibiotic-ResistantInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Reply to Watt.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angkana SommanustweechaiLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, England.
Sunicha ChanvatikInternational Health Policy Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 110000, Thailand.
Varavoot SermsinsiriFood and Drug Administration, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Somsajee SivilaikulDepartment of Livestock Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Phathumtani, Thailand.
Walaiporn PatcharanarumolInternational Health Policy Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 110000, Thailand.
Shunmay YeungLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, England.
Viroj TangcharoensathienInternational Health Policy Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 110000, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyse how antibiotics are imported, manufactured, distributed and regulated in Thailand.

methodsWe gathered information, on antibiotic distribution in Thailand, in in-depth interviews - with 43 key informants from farms, health facilities, pharmaceutical and animal feed industries, private pharmacies and regulators- and in database and literature searches.

findingsIn 2016-2017, licensed antibiotic distribution in Thailand involves over 700 importers and about 24 000 distributors - e.g. retail pharmacies and wholesalers. Thailand imports antibiotics and active pharmaceutical ingredients. There is no system for monitoring the distribution of active ingredients, some of which are used directly on farms, without being processed. Most antibiotics can be bought from pharmacies, for home or farm use, without a prescription. Although the 1987 Drug Act classified most antibiotics as "dangerous drugs", it only classified a few of them as prescription-only medicines and placed no restrictions on the quantities of antibiotics that could be sold to any individual. Pharmacists working in pharmacies are covered by some of the Act's regulations, but the quality of their dispensing and prescribing appears to be largely reliant on their competences.

conclusionIn Thailand, most antibiotics are easily and widely available from retail pharmacies, without a prescription. If the inappropriate use of active pharmaceutical ingredients and antibiotics is to be reduced, we need to reclassify and restrict access to certain antibiotics and to develop systems to audit the dispensing of antibiotics in the retail sector and track the movements of active ingredients.

Indexed as

Drug and Narcotic ControlPharmaciesPharmacistsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansInterviews as TopicThailandAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29403113
PMCPMC5791780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.