Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29403097›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2018

Trends in catastrophic health expenditure in India: 1993 to 2014.

Anamika Pandey, George B Ploubidis, Lynda Clarke, Lalit Dandona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anamika PandeyPublic Health Foundation of India, Plot 47, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurugram 122 002, National Capital Region, India.
George B PloubidisCentre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Institute of Education, London, England.
Lynda ClarkeDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England.
Lalit DandonaPublic Health Foundation of India, Plot 47, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurugram 122 002, National Capital Region, India.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate trends in out-of-pocket health-care payments and catastrophic health expenditure in India by household age composition.

methodsWe obtained data from four national consumer expenditure surveys and three health-care utilization surveys conducted between 1993 and 2014. Households were divided into five groups by age composition. We defined catastrophic health expenditure as out-of-pocket payments equalling or exceeding 10% of household expenditure. Factors associated with catastrophic expenditure were identified by multivariable analysis.

findingsOverall, the proportion of catastrophic health expenditure increased 1.47-fold between the 1993-1994 expenditure survey (12.4%) and the 2011-2012 expenditure survey (18.2%) and 2.24-fold between the 1995-1996 utilization survey (11.1%) and the 2014 utilization survey (24.9%). The proportion increased more in the poorest than the richest quintile: 3.00-fold versus 1.74-fold, respectively, across the utilization surveys. Catastrophic expenditure was commonest among households comprising only people aged 60 years or older: the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) was 3.26 (95% confidence interval, CI: 2.76-3.84) compared with households with no older people or children younger than 5 years. The risk was also increased among households with both older people and children (aOR: 2.58; 95% CI: 2.31-2.89), with a female head (aOR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.19-1.47) and with a rural location (aOR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.20-1.35).

conclusionThe proportion of households experiencing catastrophic health expenditure in India increased over the past two decades. Such expenditure was highest among households with older people. Financial protection mechanisms are needed for population groups at risk for catastrophic health expenditure.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultCatastrophic IllnessChildFemaleFinancing, PersonalHealth ExpendituresHealth ServicesHumansIndiaMiddle AgedPovertySocial Class

Identifiers

PMID29403097
PMCPMC5791868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.