Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29403051›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

No evidence that carotenoid pigments boost either immune or antioxidant defenses in a songbird.

Rebecca E Koch, Andreas N Kavazis, Dennis Hasselquist, Wendy R Hood, Yufeng Zhang, Matthew B Toomey, Geoffrey E Hill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
389.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1,932 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Testosterone regulatesProceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Defense against predators incurs high reproductive costs for the aposematic mothBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Rebecca E KochDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, 331 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA. rebecca.adrian@monash.edu.
Andreas N KavazisSchool of Kinesiology, Auburn University, 301 Wire Road, Auburn, AL, 36840, USA.
Dennis HasselquistDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Ekologihuset, Sölvegatan 37, SE-323 62, Lund, Sweden.
Wendy R HoodDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, 331 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Yufeng ZhangDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, 331 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Matthew B ToomeyDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9184-197X
Geoffrey E HillDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, 331 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Auburn University · USBuck Institute for Research on Aging · USLund University · SEMonash University · AUWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary carotenoids have been proposed to boost immune system and antioxidant functions in vertebrate animals, but studies aimed at testing these physiological functions of carotenoids have often failed to find support. Here we subject yellow canaries (Serinus canaria), which possess high levels of carotenoids in their tissue, and white recessive canaries, which possess a knockdown mutation that results in very low levels of tissue carotenoids, to oxidative and pathogen challenges. Across diverse measures of physiological performance, we detect no differences between carotenoid-rich yellow and carotenoid-deficient white canaries. These results add further challenge to the assumption that carotenoids are directly involved in supporting physiological function in vertebrate animals. While some dietary carotenoids provide indirect benefits as retinoid precursors, our observations suggest that carotenoids themselves may play little to no direct role in key physiological processes in birds.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsCanariesCarotenoidsGene Expression RegulationImmunity, InnateLipopolysaccharidesMutationPigmentationPigments, BiologicalScavenger Receptors, Class BTetanus ToxoidAntioxidantsCarotenoidsLipopolysaccharidesPigments, BiologicalScavenger Receptors, Class BTetanus Toxoid

Identifiers

PMID29403051
PMCPMC5799171
OpenAlexW2788593837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.