Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29403014›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2018

Deaminase-mediated multiplex genome editing in Escherichia coli.

Satomi Banno, Keiji Nishida, Takayuki Arazoe, Hitoshi Mitsunobu, Akihiko Kondo

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 226 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. STAGE: A compact and versatile TnpB-based genome editing toolkit forProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Engineering Agrobacterium for improved plant transformation.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  20. Precision engineering of the probioticApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Satomi BannoGraduate School of Science, Technology and Innovation, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5853-5003
Keiji NishidaGraduate School of Science, Technology and Innovation, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. keiji_nishida@people.kobe-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-9371-4971
Takayuki ArazoeGraduate School of Science, Technology and Innovation, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Hitoshi MitsunobuGraduate School of Science, Technology and Innovation, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Akihiko KondoGraduate School of Science, Technology and Innovation, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. akondo@kobe-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-1527-5288
Kobe University · JPTokyo University of Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In eukaryotes, the CRISPR-Cas9 system has now been widely used as a revolutionary genome engineering tool

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsCytidine DeaminaseDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesDNA GlycosylasesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGalactokinaseGene EditingGenetic EngineeringGenome, BacterialPoint MutationRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTransposasesCytidine DeaminaseDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesDNA GlycosylasesEscherichia coli ProteinsGalactokinaseRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsrpoB protein, E coliTransposases

Identifiers

PMID29403014
OpenAlexW2789818578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.