Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29402955›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2018

The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ute Kreplin, Miguel Farias, Inti A Brazil

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06136676 (From the Heart Multi-Centre Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06136676 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

From the Heart Multi-Centre Study: Comparing the Effects of Spiritual and Secular Meditation on Psychophysiology, Cognition, Mental Health, and Social Functioning in Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorCoventry UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled288ConditionsProsocial Behavior, Forgiveness, Empathy, PainArmsArm 1 - Heart-Centred Spiritual Meditation: Christian contemplation, Arm 1 - Heart-Centred Spiritual Meditation: Islamic contemplation, Arm 2 - Action Control: Mindfulness Meditation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Empirical Status of Mindfulness-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review of 44 Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Effects of compassion training on brain responses to suffering others.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. (State) empathy: how context matters.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ute KreplinSchool of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. u.kreplin@massey.ac.nz.
Miguel FariasBrain, Belief, & Behaviour Lab, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, England. miguel.farias@coventry.ac.uk.
Inti A BrazilBrain, Belief, & Behaviour Lab, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, England. i.brazil@donders.ru.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many individuals believe that meditation has the capacity to not only alleviate mental-illness but to improve prosociality. This article systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the effects of meditation interventions on prosociality in randomized controlled trials of healthy adults. Five types of social behaviours were identified: compassion, empathy, aggression, connectedness and prejudice. Although we found a moderate increase in prosociality following meditation, further analysis indicated that this effect was qualified by two factors: type of prosociality and methodological quality. Meditation interventions had an effect on compassion and empathy, but not on aggression, connectedness or prejudice. We further found that compassion levels only increased under two conditions: when the teacher in the meditation intervention was a co-author in the published study; and when the study employed a passive (waiting list) control group but not an active one. Contrary to popular beliefs that meditation will lead to prosocial changes, the results of this meta-analysis showed that the effects of meditation on prosociality were qualified by the type of prosociality and methodological quality of the study. We conclude by highlighting a number of biases and theoretical problems that need addressing to improve quality of research in this area.

Indexed as

Social SkillsAdultAggressionBiasEmpathyFemaleHumansMaleMeditationPrejudiceRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID29402955
PMCPMC5799363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.