Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29402908›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2018

Enhanced Reality Showing Long-Lasting Analgesia after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kyo-In Koo, Dae Kwon Park, Yoon Seok Youm, Sung Do Cho, Chang Ho Hwang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Immersive Virtual Reality for Postoperative Pain Among Older Adults: A Scoping Review.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Novel Coronavirus and Orthopaedic Surgery: Early Experiences from Singapore.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyo-In KooDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Dae Kwon ParkDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Yoon Seok YoumDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine Ulsan, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Sung Do ChoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Dongcheon Dong-Kang Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Chang Ho HwangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea. chhwang1220ciba@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0444-3602

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To overcome the limitation of short-term efficacy of virtual reality (VR), an enhanced reality (ER) analgesia, (combination of the VR, real-time motion capture, mirror therapy [MT]) involving a high degree of patients' presence or embodiment was explored. Patients, who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA), received ER analgesia. The duration was 5 times a week, for 2 weeks for one group and 5 times a week, for 1 week in the other. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at rest and during movement, active knee range of motion (ROM) for flexion and extension were measured repeatedly. After screening 157 patients, 60 were included. Pre-interventional evaluation was performed at 6.7 days and ER was initiated at 12.4 days after surgery. Evaluation was performed at 5, 12, 33 days after the initiation of ER. Analgesia in the 2 week therapy group was effective until the third evaluation (p = 0.000), whereas in the other group, it was effective only until the second evaluation (p = 0.010). Improvement in ROM in the 2 week group was also maintained until the third evaluation (p = 0.037, p = 0.009). It could lay the foundations for the development of safe and long-lasting analgesic tools.

Indexed as

Virtual Reality Exposure TherapyAgedAnalgesiaArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PainProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29402908
PMCPMC5799299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.