Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29402898›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Exploring coral microbiome assemblages in the South China Sea.

Lin Cai, Ren-Mao Tian, Guowei Zhou, Haoya Tong, Yue Him Wong, Weipeng Zhang, Apple Pui Yi Chui, James Y Xie, Jian-Wen Qiu, Put O Ang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Adaptive changes of coralFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lin CaiShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ren-Mao TianShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Guowei ZhouShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Haoya TongShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yue Him WongShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Weipeng ZhangShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Apple Pui Yi ChuiMarine Science Laboratory, Department of Biology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
James Y XieDepartment of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jian-Wen QiuDepartment of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1541-9627
Put O AngMarine Science Laboratory, Department of Biology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sheng LiuKey Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Hui HuangKey Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China. huanghui@scsio.ac.cn.
Pei-Yuan QianShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China. boqianpy@ust.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coral reefs are significant ecosystems. The ecological success of coral reefs relies on not only coral-algal symbiosis but also coral-microbial partnership. However, microbiome assemblages in the South China Sea corals remain largely unexplored. Here, we compared the microbiome assemblages of reef-building corals Galaxea (G. fascicularis) and Montipora (M. venosa, M. peltiformis, M. monasteriata) collected from five different locations in the South China Sea using massively-parallel sequencing of 16S rRNA gene and multivariate analysis. The results indicated that microbiome assemblages for each coral species were unique regardless of location and were different from the corresponding seawater. Host type appeared to drive the coral microbiome assemblages rather than location and seawater. Network analysis was employed to explore coral microbiome co-occurrence patterns, which revealed 61 and 80 co-occurring microbial species assembling the Galaxea and Montipora microbiomes, respectively. Most of these co-occurring microbial species were commonly found in corals and were inferred to play potential roles in host nutrient metabolism; carbon, nitrogen, sulfur cycles; host detoxification; and climate change. These findings suggest that the co-occurring microbial species explored might be essential to maintain the critical coral-microbial partnership. The present study provides new insights into coral microbiome assemblages in the South China Sea.

Indexed as

MetagenomeAnimalsAnthozoaArchaeaBacteriaCarbon CycleChinaCoral ReefsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrobiotaNitrogen CyclePacific OceanRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeawaterSulfurSymbiosisRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSulfur

Identifiers

PMID29402898
PMCPMC5799258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.