Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29402253›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Design of a study evaluating the effects, health economics, and stakeholder perspectives of a multi-component occupational rehabilitation program with an added workplace intervention - a  study protocol.

Marit B Rise, Martin Skagseth, Nina E Klevanger, Lene Aasdahl, Petter Borchgrevink, Chris Jensen, Hanne Tenggren, Vidar Halsteinli, Trym N Jacobsen, Svein B Løland and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02541890 (Effects of Workplace Intervention in Inpatient Occupational Rehabilitation on Return to Work for Persons With Somatic and/or Common Mental Health Problems. A Randomised Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02541890 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Workplace Intervention in Inpatient Occupational Rehabilitation on Return to Work for Persons With Somatic and/or Common Mental Health Problems. A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyRan2015 to 2018Enrolled175ConditionsMental Disorders, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Fatigue Syndrome, ChronicArmsWork place intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marit B RiseDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. marit.b.rise@ntnu.no.ORCID 0000-0002-6780-6709
Martin SkagsethDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Nina E KlevangerDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Lene AasdahlDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Petter BorchgrevinkHysnes Rehabilitation Center, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Chris JensenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Hanne TenggrenHysnes Rehabilitation Center, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Vidar HalsteinliDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Trym N JacobsenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Svein B LølandHysnes Rehabilitation Center, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Roar JohnsenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Marius S FimlandDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent research has suggested that interventions at the workplace might be the most potent ingredient in return to work interventions, but few studies have investigated the different effects of workplace interventions as part of occupational rehabilitation programs. The comprehensive design described in this article includes effect (on return to work and health outcomes), and health economic evaluations of a workplace intervention added to a multicomponent rehabilitation program. Qualitative and mixed method studies will investigate sick-listed persons', rehabilitation therapists' and employers' perspectives on the usability and outcomes of the rehabilitation program and the workplace intervention. The program and intervention are provided to patients with musculoskeletal, psychological or general and unspecified diagnoses. The program is multi-component and includes Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, physical exercise, patient education and creating a plan for increased work participation.

methodsPersons who are employed, aged from 18 to 60 years, with a current sick leave status of 50% or more and a diagnosis within the musculoskeletal, psychological or general and unspecified chapters of International Classification of Primary Care-2 (ICPC-2) will be recruited to a researcher-blinded parallel-group randomized controlled trial. All participants take part in an in-patient occupational rehabilitation program, while the intervention group also takes part in an intervention at the workplace. The effect and economic evaluation will investigate the effect of the added workplace intervention. The primary outcome measures will be time until full sustainable return to work and total number of sickness absence days in the 12 months after inclusion. Health economic evaluations will investigate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility. Qualitative studies will investigate rehabilitation therapists' experiences with working towards return to work within an ACT-approach and stakeholders' experiences with the workplace intervention. A mixed methods study will combine quantitative and qualitative findings on the participants' expectations and motivation for return to work. DISCUSSION: The outline of this comprehensive study could represent an important addition to the standard designs of return to work evaluation. The mixed methods design, with qualitative approaches as well as a rigorous randomized controlled trial, might prove useful to shed light on contextual factors.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02541890 . September 4, 2015.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMusculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational Health ServicesOccupational TherapyAdolescentAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisEconomics, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignAbsenteeismAcceptance and commitment therapyCognitive behaviour therapyMental healthMusculoskeletal diseasesOccupational healthReturn to work

Identifiers

PMID29402253
PMCPMC5800096
OpenAlexW2795258785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.