Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29402234›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2018

Randomised controlled trial protocol (GRIP study): examining the effect of involvement of a general practitioner and home care oncology nurse after a cancer diagnosis on patient reported outcomes and healthcare utilization.

I A A Perfors, C W Helsper, E A Noteboom, E van der Wall, N J de Wit, A M May

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

I A A PerforsJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
C W HelsperJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. C.W.Helsper-2@UMCUtrecht.nl.
E A NoteboomJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E van der WallInternal Medicine and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
N J de WitJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A M MayJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

Danone Ecosystem Fund Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the ageing population and improving diagnostics and treatments, the number of cancer patients and cancer survivors is increasing. Policymakers, patients and professionals advocate a transfer of (part of) cancer care from the hospital environment to the primary care setting, as this could stimulate personalized and integrated care, increase cost-effectiveness and would better meet the patients' needs and expectations. The effects of structured active follow-up from primary care after cancer diagnosis have not been studied yet. Therefore the GRIP study aims to assess the effects of structured follow-up after a cancer diagnosis, by a primary care team including a general practitioner (GP) and a home care oncology nurse (HON), on satisfaction and healthcare utilization of patients treated with curative intent.

methodsWe will conduct a multicentre, two-arm randomised controlled trial in The Netherlands. We plan to include 150 patients who will be treated with curative intent for either breast, lung, colorectal, gynaecologic cancer, or melanoma. Further inclusion criteria are: age 18 years and older, able to answer questionnaires in Dutch, GP agrees to participate and the possibility to include the patient before the start of treatment. All patients receive care as usual. The intervention arm will receive additional structured follow-up consisting of a GP consultation before onset of treatment to empower the patient for shared decision making with the specialist and a minimum of three contacts with the HON during and after treatment. Primary outcomes are: patient satisfaction with care at the level of specialist, GP and nurse and healthcare utilization. Secondary outcomes include: quality of life, employment status, patient empowerment, shared decision making, mental health and satisfaction with given information. Repeated questionnaires, filled in by the participants, will be assessed within the 1-year study period. DISCUSSION: This randomised controlled trial will evaluate the effects of structured follow-up after a cancer diagnosis by a primary care team including a GP and HON, for patients undergoing treatment with curative intent. Results from the present study may provide the evidence needed to optimally rearrange responsibilities in cancer care delivery and consequently improve cancer care and patient related outcomes.

trial registrationTrial number: NTR5909 .

Indexed as

General PractitionersHome Care ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNetherlandsOncology NursingQuality of LifeCancerDecision makingFollow-upGeneral practitionerHealthcare utilizationHomecare oncology nursePatient satisfactionPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID29402234
PMCPMC5799905
OpenAlexW2793929636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.