Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29402189›Full record

ArticleStem cells and development2018

Simplified Footprint-Free Cas9/CRISPR Editing of Cardiac-Associated Genes in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Alexander Kondrashov, Minh Duc Hoang, James G W Smith, Jamie R Bhagwan, Gary Duncan, Diogo Mosqueira, Maria Barbadillo Munoz, Nguyen T N Vo, Chris Denning

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells and development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Selecting for CRISPR-Edited Knock-In Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated generation and analysis of N terminus polymorphic models of βMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander KondrashovDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, Centre of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, United Kingdom .
Minh Duc HoangDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, Centre of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, United Kingdom .
James G W SmithDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, Centre of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, United Kingdom .
Jamie R BhagwanDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, Centre of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, United Kingdom .
Gary DuncanDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, Centre of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, United Kingdom .
Diogo MosqueiraDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, Centre of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, United Kingdom .
Maria Barbadillo MunozDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, Centre of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, United Kingdom .
Nguyen T N VoDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, Centre of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, United Kingdom .
Chris DenningDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, Centre of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, United Kingdom .
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/09/027/27141British Heart Foundation PG/14/59/31000British Heart Foundation RG/11/19/29264British Heart Foundation RG/14/1/30588British Heart Foundation RG/15/6/31436British Heart Foundation SP/15/9/31605Medical Research Council MR/L012618/1Medical Research Council MR/M017354/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/C013202/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K000225/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling disease with human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) is hindered because the impact on cell phenotype from genetic variability between individuals can be greater than from the pathogenic mutation. While "footprint-free" Cas9/CRISPR editing solves this issue, existing approaches are inefficient or lengthy. In this study, a simplified PiggyBac strategy shortened hPSC editing by 2 weeks and required one round of clonal expansion and genotyping rather than two, with similar efficiencies to the longer conventional process. Success was shown across four cardiac-associated loci (ADRB2, GRK5, RYR2, and ACTC1) by genomic cleavage and editing efficiencies of 8%-93% and 8%-67%, respectively, including mono- and/or biallelic events. Pluripotency was retained, as was differentiation into high-purity cardiomyocytes (CMs; 88%-99%). Using the GRK5 isogenic lines as an exemplar, chronic stimulation with the β-adrenoceptor agonist, isoprenaline, reduced beat rate in hPSC-CMs expressing GRK5-Q41 but not GRK5-L41; this was reversed by the β-blocker, propranolol. This shortened, footprint-free approach will be useful for mechanistic studies.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell LineClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMyocytes, CardiaccardiomyocytesCas9/CRISPRgene editinggenetic disease modelinghuman pluripotent stem cellsPiggyBac

Identifiers

PMID29402189
PMCPMC5882176
OpenAlexW2801973799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.