Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29402085›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2018

Filter-Based Protein Digestion (FPD): A Detergent-Free and Scaffold-Based Strategy for TMT Workflows.

Ekaterina Stepanova, Steven P Gygi, Joao A Paulo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Quantitative Proteomics Using Isobaric Labeling: A Practical Guide.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ekaterina StepanovaDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Steven P GygiDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Joao A PauloDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4291-413X
Harvard University · US

Funding

New Sample Multiplexing Technologies to Identify Chemical Probes and Illuminate Ubiquitin BiologyR01GM067945 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI GYGI, STEVEN P · 2003 to 2024
$10.5M
Resolving the role of nicotine-mediated phosphorylation on pancreatic fibrosisK01DK098285 · NIDDK · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PAULO, JOAO A · 2013 to 2017
$638k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK098285NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput proteome profiling requires thorough optimization to achieve comprehensive analysis. We developed a filter aided sample preparation (FASP)-like, detergent-free method, termed Filter-Based Protein Digestion (FPD). We compared FPD to protein extraction methods commonly used in isobaric tag-based proteome profiling, namely trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and chloroform-methanol (C-M) precipitation. We divided a mammalian whole cell lysate from the SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line for parallel protein processing with TCA (n = 3), C-M (n = 2), and FPD using either 10 kDa (n = 3) or 30 kDa (n = 3) molecular weight cutoff membranes. We labeled each sample with tandem mass tag (TMT) reagents to construct a TMT11-plex experiment. In total, 8654 proteins were quantified across all samples. Pairwise comparisons showed very little deviation for individual protein abundance measurements between the two FPD methods, whereas TCA and FPD showed the most difference. Specifically, membrane proteins were more readily quantified when samples were processed using TCA precipitation than other methods tested. However, globally, only 4% of proteins differed greater than 4-fold in the most divergent pair of protein extraction methods (i.e., FPD10 and TCA). We conclude that the detergent-free FPD strategy, particularly using the faster-flowing 30 kDa filter, is a seamless alteration to high-throughput TMT workflows.

Indexed as

ProteolysisCell Line, TumorChemical PrecipitationChloroformFiltrationHumansMembrane ProteinsMethanolNeuronsProteomeStaining and LabelingTandem Mass SpectrometryTrichloroacetic AcidTrypsinWorkflowChloroformMembrane ProteinsMethanolProteomeTrichloroacetic AcidTrypsinFASPLumosprecipitationsample preparationSPS-MS3TMT

Identifiers

PMID29402085
PMCPMC5984590
OpenAlexW2786926071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.