ArticleJournal of proteome research2018
Filter-Based Protein Digestion (FPD): A Detergent-Free and Scaffold-Based Strategy for TMT Workflows.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Suspension-Trapping Protocol for Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation.Bio-protocol · 2026Article
- Quantitative Proteomics Using Isobaric Labeling: A Practical Guide.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2021Review
- High-throughput and Deep-proteome Profiling by 16-plex Tandem Mass Tag Labeling Coupled with Two-dimensional Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2020Article
- TMT Labeling for the Masses: A Robust and Cost-efficient, In-solution Labeling Approach.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2019Article
- Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation for proteomics experiments.Nature protocols · 2019Article
- Streamlined Tandem Mass Tag (SL-TMT) Protocol: An Efficient Strategy for Quantitative (Phospho)proteome Profiling Using Tandem Mass Tag-Synchronous Precursor Selection-MS3.Journal of proteome research · 2018Article
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics to Unveil the Non-coding RNA World.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput proteome profiling requires thorough optimization to achieve comprehensive analysis. We developed a filter aided sample preparation (FASP)-like, detergent-free method, termed Filter-Based Protein Digestion (FPD). We compared FPD to protein extraction methods commonly used in isobaric tag-based proteome profiling, namely trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and chloroform-methanol (C-M) precipitation. We divided a mammalian whole cell lysate from the SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line for parallel protein processing with TCA (n = 3), C-M (n = 2), and FPD using either 10 kDa (n = 3) or 30 kDa (n = 3) molecular weight cutoff membranes. We labeled each sample with tandem mass tag (TMT) reagents to construct a TMT11-plex experiment. In total, 8654 proteins were quantified across all samples. Pairwise comparisons showed very little deviation for individual protein abundance measurements between the two FPD methods, whereas TCA and FPD showed the most difference. Specifically, membrane proteins were more readily quantified when samples were processed using TCA precipitation than other methods tested. However, globally, only 4% of proteins differed greater than 4-fold in the most divergent pair of protein extraction methods (i.e., FPD10 and TCA). We conclude that the detergent-free FPD strategy, particularly using the faster-flowing 30 kDa filter, is a seamless alteration to high-throughput TMT workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.