Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29401746›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring-Review and Avenues for Development.

Maya Harary, Rianne G F Dolmans, William B Gormley

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04900168 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Multi-center Observational Cohort Study of Management of Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury With or Without Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Patients With Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury in China

TypeobservationalSponsorTang-Du HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled832ConditionsModerate Traumatic Brain InjuryArmsIntracranial pressure monitoring
NCT05170295 completednot on this map

Noninvasive Monitoring of Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation

TypeobservationalSponsorOchsner Health SystemRan2018 to 2021Enrolled14ConditionsIntracranial Pressure Increase, Cerebral Edema
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Resuscitative endovascular occlusion of the aorta restores cerebral metabolic markers of ischaemia induced by haemorrhagic shock.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Cerebral glycerol during haemorrhagic shock in normal and raised intracranial pressure resuscitated with total REBOA: an experimental porcine study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Advancements in Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring via Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurement.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maya HararyComputational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. mharary@partners.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9962-8900
Rianne G F DolmansComputational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. r.g.f.dolmans@students.uu.nl.
William B GormleyComputational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. wgormley@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0350-9131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a staple of neurocritical care. The most commonly used current methods of monitoring in the acute setting include fluid-based systems, implantable transducers and Doppler ultrasonography. It is well established that management of elevated ICP is critical for clinical outcomes. However, numerous studies show that current methods of ICP monitoring cannot reliably define the limit of the brain's intrinsic compensatory capacity to manage increases in pressure, which would allow for proactive ICP management. Current work in the field hopes to address this gap by harnessing live-streaming ICP pressure-wave data and a multimodal integration with other physiologic measures. Additionally, there is continued development of non-invasive ICP monitoring methods for use in specific clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

Intracranial PressureBrainBrain InjuriesHumansMonitoring, Physiologiccerebral complianceintracranial pressure monitoringneurocritical care

Identifiers

PMID29401746
PMCPMC5855101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.