Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29401739›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2018

Self-Organized Nanostructure Modified Microelectrode for Sensitive Electrochemical Glutamate Detection in Stem Cells-Derived Brain Organoids.

Babak Nasr, Rachael Chatterton, Jason Hsien Ming Yong, Pegah Jamshidi, Giovanna Marisa D'Abaco, Andrew Robin Bjorksten, Omid Kavehei, Gursharan Chana, Mirella Dottori, Efstratios Skafidas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Novel CDKL5 targets identified in human iPSC-derived neurons.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Article
  9. Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Brain physiome: A concept bridgingBioactive materials · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A MinireviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Babak NasrCentre for Neural Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia. babak.nasr@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5966-5280
Rachael ChattertonCentre for Neural Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia. rachael.chatterton@florey.edu.au.
Jason Hsien Ming YongCentre for Neural Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia. jasony1@student.unimelb.edu.au.
Pegah JamshidiCentre for Neural Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia. golpeg@yahoo.com.
Giovanna Marisa D'AbacoThe Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. gdabaco@unimelb.edu.au.
Andrew Robin BjorkstenThe Department of Anaesthesia & Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia. andrew.bjorksten@mh.org.au.
Omid KaveheiFaculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. omid.kavehei@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-2753-5553
Gursharan ChanaCentre for Neural Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia. gchana@unimelb.edu.au.
Mirella DottoriCentre for Neural Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia. mdottori@uow.edu.au.
Efstratios SkafidasCentre for Neural Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia. sskaf@unimelb.edu.au.
The University of Melbourne · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons release neurotransmitters such as glutamate to communicate with each other and to coordinate brain functioning. As increased glutamate release is indicative of neuronal maturation and activity, a system that can measure glutamate levels over time within the same tissue and/or culture system is highly advantageous for neurodevelopmental investigation. To address such challenges, we develop for the first time a convenient method to realize functionalized borosilicate glass capillaries with nanostructured texture as an electrochemical biosensor to detect glutamate release from cerebral organoids generated from human embryonic stem cells (hESC) that mimic various brain regions. The biosensor shows a clear catalytic activity toward the oxidation of glutamate with a sensitivity of 93 ± 9.5 nA·µM

Indexed as

MicroelectrodesBiosensing TechniquesBrainCells, CulturedElectrochemistryEmbryonic Stem CellsGlutamic AcidHumansNanostructuresNeural Stem CellsOrganoidsGlutamic Acidamperometryelectrochemical biosensorsglutamatehuman embryonic stem cellsmicroelectrodesorganoids

Identifiers

PMID29401739
PMCPMC5872062
OpenAlexW2792665736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.