Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29401699›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

The Effect of a Leisure Time Physical Activity Intervention Delivered via a Workplace: 15-Month Follow-Up Study.

Marit Skogstad, Lars-Kristian Lunde, Bente Ulvestad, Hans Christian D Aass, Thomas Clemm, Asgeir Mamen, Øivind Skare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marit SkogstadDepartment Occupational Medicine and Epidemiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Box 8149 Deptartment, 0033 Oslo, Norway. Marit.Skogstad@stami.no.
Lars-Kristian LundeDepartment for Work Psychology and Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Box 8149 0033 Oslo, Norway. Lars-Kristian.Lunde@stami.no.
Bente UlvestadDepartment Occupational Medicine and Epidemiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Box 8149 Deptartment, 0033 Oslo, Norway. Bente.Ulvestad@stami.no.
Hans Christian D AassThe Blood Cell Research Group, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Ullevaal, Norway. h.c.aass@medisin.uio.no.
Thomas ClemmOccupational Health Service Department, Mesta AS, Fanaveien 221 C, 5239 Rådal, Norway. Thomas.Clemm@mesta.no.
Asgeir MamenNorwegian School of Health Sciences, Kristiania University College, Box 1190 Sentrum, 0107 Oslo, Norway. asgeir.mamen@nhck.no.
Øivind SkareDepartment Occupational Medicine and Epidemiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Box 8149 Deptartment, 0033 Oslo, Norway. Oivind.Skare@stami.no.ORCID 0000-0001-8043-2820

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In line with recommendations from both the World Health Organization and the European Union some employers encourage workplace health promotion through physical activity (PA) facilities and leisure time PA-initiatives. The current study describes a 15-month follow-up after an 8-week workplace delivered PA-initiative, investigates if improvements in cardiovascular risk status are sustainable, and elucidates differences according to educational level. One hundred and twenty one employees (43 women) were examined before and after the 8-week PA-initiative and 94 at the 15-month follow-up. PA-levels, blood pressure, resting heart rate, lipids, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), C-reactive protein (CRP), and selected markers of inflammation were registered at baseline, immediately after the 8-week PA-initiative, and 15 months after baseline. At the end of follow-up (15-month), PA-levels-increased during the 8-week intervention-had returned to baseline values. None of the five improvements in cardiovascular markers (total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL), P-selectin, CD40Ligand (CD40L) and Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)) seen at the 8-week follow-up were sustained. At the 15-month follow-up as compared to baseline HbA1c, CRP (log) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were reduced by 0.06 mmol/L (95% CI -0.11,-0.01), 0.25 mg/L (95% CI -0.46,-0.04) and 0.39 pg/mL (95% CI -0.75, -0.04), respectively. At baseline, there were differences in cardiovascular risk factors comparing men with low versus high levels of education. No differences in changes in outcomes between these groups of men were found during follow-up. In this study highly educated men generally have lower levels of cardiovascular risk factors, but the effect of PA on such markers in this group do not differ from the effects seen in less educated men.

Indexed as

Leisure ActivitiesAdultBiomarkersBlood PressureC-Reactive ProteinExerciseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlycated HemoglobinHealth PromotionHumansInflammationLipidsMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinGlycated HemoglobinLipidscardiovascularoccupational healthphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID29401699
PMCPMC5858333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.