Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29401500›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Mobile direct observation of therapy (MDOT) - A rapid systematic review and pilot study in children with asthma.

Michael D Shields, Fahad ALQahtani, Michael P Rivey, James C McElnay

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Video directly observed therapy to improve inhaler technique among pediatric patients with persistent asthma.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Medication Adherence in Children with Asthma.Patient preference and adherence · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Recent Advances in Long-Term Management of Asthma.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Michael D ShieldsCentre for Infection and Immunity. School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Fahad ALQahtaniClinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Michael P RiveyClinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
James C McElnayClinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1082-9715
Queen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe, for the first time, the use of a mobile device platform for remote direct observation of inhaler use and technique. The research programme commenced with a rapid systematic review of mobile device (or videophone) use for direct observation of therapy (MDOT). Ten studies (mainly pilots) were identified involving patients with tuberculosis, sickle cell disease and Alzheimer's disease. New studies are ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov website) in TB, stroke, sickle cell disease, HIV and opioid dependence. Having identified no prior use of MDOT in inhaler monitoring, we implemented a feasibility study in 12 healthy volunteer children (2-12 years; 8 females and 4 males) over a period of 14 days, with twice daily video upload of their 'dummy' inhaler use. Two children uploaded 100% of the requested videos, with only one child having an inhaler upload rate of <75%. The quality of uploaded videos was generally good (only 1.7% of unacceptable quality for evaluation). The final aspect of the research was a pilot study using MDOT (6 weeks) in 22 children with difficult to treat asthma. Healthcare professionals evaluated inhaler technique using uploaded videos and provided telephone instruction on improving inhaler use. The main outcomes were assessed at week 12 post initiation of MDOT. By week 5, all children still engaging in MDOT (n = 18) were judged to have effective inhaler technique. Spirometry values did not vary to a significantly significant degree between baseline and 12 weeks (P>0.05), however, mean fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) values normalised (mean 38.7 to 19.3ppm) and mean Asthma Control Test values improved (13.1 to mean 17.8). Feedback from participants was positive. Overall the findings open up a new paradigm in device independent (can be used for any type of inhaler device) monitoring, providing a platform for evaluating / improving inhaler use at home.

Indexed as

Directly Observed TherapySmartphoneAdolescentAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleNebulizers and VaporizersPatient CompliancePilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexAnti-Asthmatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID29401500
PMCPMC5798760
OpenAlexW2787124717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.