Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29401463›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Radiomic features analysis in computed tomography images of lung nodule classification.

Chia-Hung Chen, Chih-Kun Chang, Chih-Yen Tu, Wei-Chih Liao, Bing-Ru Wu, Kuei-Ting Chou, Yu-Rou Chiou, Shih-Neng Yang, Geoffrey Zhang, Tzung-Chi Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Scientific reports · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chia-Hung ChenDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chih-Kun ChangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Chih-Yen TuDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Wei-Chih LiaoDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Bing-Ru WuDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Kuei-Ting ChouDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yu-Rou ChiouArtificial Intelligence Center for Medical Diagnosis, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Shih-Neng YangDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Geoffrey ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, United States of America.
Tzung-Chi HuangDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5896-9170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadiomics, which extract large amount of quantification image features from diagnostic medical images had been widely used for prognostication, treatment response prediction and cancer detection. The treatment options for lung nodules depend on their diagnosis, benign or malignant. Conventionally, lung nodule diagnosis is based on invasive biopsy. Recently, radiomics features, a non-invasive method based on clinical images, have shown high potential in lesion classification, treatment outcome prediction.

methodsLung nodule classification using radiomics based on Computed Tomography (CT) image data was investigated and a 4-feature signature was introduced for lung nodule classification. Retrospectively, 72 patients with 75 pulmonary nodules were collected. Radiomics feature extraction was performed on non-enhanced CT images with contours which were delineated by an experienced radiation oncologist.

resultAmong the 750 image features in each case, 76 features were found to have significant differences between benign and malignant lesions. A radiomics signature was composed of the best 4 features which included Laws_LSL_min, Laws_SLL_energy, Laws_SSL_skewness and Laws_EEL_uniformity. The accuracy using the signature in benign or malignant classification was 84% with the sensitivity of 92.85% and the specificity of 72.73%.

conclusionThe classification signature based on radiomics features demonstrated very good accuracy and high potential in clinical application.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29401463
PMCPMC5798832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.