Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29400118›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2018

Trabecular metal acetabular components in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Inari Laaksonen, Michelle Lorimer, Kirill Gromov, Antti Eskelinen, Ola Rolfson, Stephen E Graves, Henrik Malchau, Maziar Mohaddes

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06287021 (Bone Remodeling Around a 3D-printed Highly-porous Trabecular Titanium Acetabular Cup in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06287021 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Bone Remodeling Around a 3D-printed Highly-porous Trabecular Titanium Acetabular Cup in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorPermedica spaRan2024 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsTotal Hip ArthroplastyArmsJump System Traser® cup, Jump System HAX-Pore® cup
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Inari Laaksonena Harris Orthopedic Laboratory , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , USA.
Michelle Lorimerc Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry , Adelaide , Australia.
Kirill Gromovd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre , Copenhagen , Denmark ; Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register , Aarhus , Denmark.
Antti Eskelinene Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement , Tampere , Finland ; Finnish Arthroplasty Register , Helsinki , Finland.
Ola Rolfsonf Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register , Department of Orthopaedics , Institute of Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden.
Stephen E Gravesc Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry , Adelaide , Australia.
Henrik Malchaua Harris Orthopedic Laboratory , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , USA.
Maziar Mohaddesf Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register , Department of Orthopaedics , Institute of Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose - Trabecular metal (TM) cups have demonstrated favorable results in acetabular revision and their use in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing. Some evidence show that TM cups might decrease periprosthetic infection (PPI) incidence. We compared the survivorship of TM cups with that of other uncemented cups in primary THA, and evaluated whether the use of TM cups is associated with a lower risk of PPI. Patients and methods - 10,113 primary THAs with TM cup and 85,596 THAs with other uncemented cups from 2 high-quality national arthroplasty registries were included. The mean follow-up times were 3.0 years for the TM cups and 3.8 years for the other uncemented cups. Results - The overall survivorship up to 8 years for TM cups and other uncemented cups was 94.4% and 96.2%, respectively (p = < 0.001). Adjusting for relevant covariates in a Cox regression model the TM cups had a persistently higher revision risk than other uncemented cups (HR =1.5, 95% CI 1.4-1.7, p = < 0.001). There was a slightly higher, though not statistically significant, revision rate for PPI in the TM group (1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.6, p = 0.09). Interpretation - Risk of revision for any reason was higher for the TM cup than for other uncemented cups in primary THA. In contrast to our hypothesis, there was no evidence that the revision rate for PPI was lower in the TM cup patients. Regardless of the promising early and mid-term results for TM cups in hip revision arthroplasty, we would like to sound a note of caution on the increasing use of the TM design, especially in uncomplicated primary THAs, where uncemented titanium cups are considered to provide a reliable outcome.

Indexed as

Hip ProsthesisProsthesis DesignAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipChildFemaleHumansJoint DiseasesMaleMetalsMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProsthesis-Related InfectionsMetals

Identifiers

PMID29400118
PMCPMC6055786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.