Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29400018›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gynecologic oncology2018

Impact of adjuvant hysterectomy on prognosis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis.

Seung Hyuk Shim, Soo Nyung Kim, Su Hyun Chae, Jung Eun Kim, Sun Joo Lee

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seung Hyuk ShimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8043-2257
Soo Nyung KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. snkim@kuh.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-4319-336X
Su Hyun ChaeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9258-8109
Jung Eun KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4769-9093
Sun Joo LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Konkuk University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFew data exist regarding adjuvant hysterectomy (AH) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. We investigated the effect of AH on prognosis in LACC patients, through meta-analysis.

methodsEMBASE and MEDLINE databases and the Cochrane Library were searched for published studies comparing LACC patients who received AH after chemoradiotherapy with those who did not, through April 2016. Endpoints were mortality and recurrence rates. For pooled estimates of the effect of AH on mortality/recurrence, random- or fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used.

resultsTwo randomized trials and six observational studies (AH following chemoradiotherapy, 630 patients; chemoradiotherapy, 585 patients) met our search criteria. Fixed-effects model-based meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in mortality between the groups (odds ratio [OR]=1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.58-1.78; p=0.968) with low cross-study heterogeneity (p=0.73 and I²=0.0). This pattern was observed in subgroup analysis for study design, radiation type, response after chemoradiotherapy, and hysterectomy type. The pooled OR for AH and recurrence was 0.59 (95% CI=0.44-0.79; p<0.05) with low cross-study heterogeneity (p=0.29 and I²=17.8), favoring the AH group. However, this pattern was not observed in the subgroup analysis for the randomized trials. There was no evidence of publication bias.

conclusionIn this meta-analysis, AH following chemoradiotherapy did not improve survival in patients with LACC, although it seemed to reduce the risk of recurrence. Concerning the significant morbidity of AH after chemoradiotherapy, routine use of AH should be avoided.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyHysterectomyFemaleHumansMEDLINEMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurvival RateUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyHysterectomyMeta-AnalysisPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID29400018
PMCPMC5823986
OpenAlexW2784008284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.