Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29399853›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of dermatology2018

Phase 1/2 study assessing the safety and efficacy of dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy in Japanese patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive advanced cutaneous melanoma.

Naoya Yamazaki, Arata Tsutsumida, Akira Takahashi, Kenjiro Namikawa, Shusuke Yoshikawa, Yutaka Fujiwara, Shunsuke Kondo, Akihira Mukaiyama, Fanghong Zhang, Yoshio Kiyohara

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of dermatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Optimal strategy in managing advanced melanoma.The Journal of dermatology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy for Melanoma in Japan.Current treatment options in oncology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Naoya YamazakiDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9638-0428
Arata TsutsumidaDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira TakahashiDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenjiro NamikawaDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shusuke YoshikawaDermatology Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yutaka FujiwaraExperimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunsuke KondoHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihira MukaiyamaDevelopment Department, Novartis Pharma K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Fanghong ZhangDevelopment Department, Novartis Pharma K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshio KiyoharaDermatology Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of dabrafenib and trametinib demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity and tolerability, at initial analysis, in Japanese patients with BRAF V600 mutant advanced melanoma warranting further investigation. This study evaluated the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of dabrafenib 150 mg b.i.d. plus trametinib 2 mg q.d. in Japanese patients with BRAF V600E/K mutant solid tumors (phase 1) and melanoma (phase 2). Phase 1 was primarily intended to assess safety and tolerability as assessed by adverse events (AE), and the primary end-point in phase 2 was to assess confirmed overall response rate (ORR). The secondary end-points in phase 1 included PK, confirmed/unconfirmed ORR and duration of response (DOR). The secondary end-points in phase 2 were PK, unconfirmed ORR, DOR, safety and tolerability. A total of 12 cutaneous melanoma patients were enrolled in the study (six in phase 1 and six in phase 2) and received the combination therapy of dabrafenib and trametinib. Common AE (≥50.0%) included pyrexia (75%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (67%), peripheral edema (50%) and nasopharyngitis (50%). The investigator-assessed ORR was reported in five patients (83%) in phase 1 and was also reported in five patients (83%; 95% confidence interval, 35.9-99.6; P < 0.0001) in phase 2. Plasma concentrations of both dabrafenib and trametinib seemed to a reach steady state by week 3. Overall, efficacy and PK properties for the dabrafenib plus trametinib combination in Japanese patients were comparable with those seen in global studies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansImidazolesJapanKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMutationOximesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafPyridonesBRAF protein, humandabrafenibImidazolesOximesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafPyridonesPyrimidinonestrametinibdabrafenibJapanesemalignant melanomasolid tumortrametinib

Identifiers

PMID29399853
PMCPMC5947742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.