Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29399672›Full record

ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering2017

Knowledge-Based Biomedical Word Sense Disambiguation with Neural Concept Embeddings

Akm Sabbir, Antonio Jimeno-Yepes, Ramakanth Kavuluru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical Note Structural Knowledge Improves Word Sense Disambiguation.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Improved biomedical word embeddings in the transformer era.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. deepBioWSD: effective deep neural word sense disambiguation of biomedical text data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A novel framework for biomedical entity sense induction.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Akm SabbirDepartment of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Antonio Jimeno-YepesIBM Research Australia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ramakanth KavuluruDivision of Biomedical Informatics (Department of Internal Medicine) and the Department of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
From Syntactic Relations to Semantic Predications: Porting Open Information Extraction to BiomedicineR21LM012274 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KAVULURU, VENKATA NAGA RAMAKANTH · 2016 to 2017
$374k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NLM NIH HHS R21 LM012274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical word sense disambiguation (WSD) is an important intermediate task in many natural language processing applications such as named entity recognition, syntactic parsing, and relation extraction. In this paper, we employ knowledge-based approaches that also exploit recent advances in neural word/concept embeddings to improve over the state-of-the-art in biomedical WSD using the public MSH WSD dataset [1] as the test set. Our methods involve weak supervision - we do not use any hand-labeled examples for WSD to build our prediction models; however, we employ an existing concept mapping program, MetaMap, to obtain our concept vectors. Over the MSH WSD dataset, our linear time (in terms of numbers of senses and words in the test instance) method achieves an accuracy of 92.24% which is a 3% improvement over the best known results [2] obtained via unsupervised means. A more expensive approach that we developed relies on a nearest neighbor framework and achieves accuracy of 94.34%, essentially cutting the error rate in half. Employing dense vector representations learned from unlabeled free text has been shown to benefit many language processing tasks recently and our efforts show that biomedical WSD is no exception to this trend. For a complex and rapidly evolving domain such as biomedicine, building labeled datasets for larger sets of ambiguous terms may be impractical. Here, we show that weak supervision that leverages recent advances in representation learning can rival supervised approaches in biomedical WSD. However, external knowledge bases (here sense inventories) play a key role in the improvements achieved.

Identifiers

PMID29399672
PMCPMC5792196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.