Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29399657›Full record

ArticleSOJ nursing & health care2017

Lay Consultations in Heart Failure Symptom Evaluation.

Katherine M Reeder, Jessica L Sims, Patrick M Ercole, Shivan S Shetty, Michael Wallendorf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SOJ nursing & health care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine M ReederUnity Point Health - Des Moines Faculty, Mercy Medical Center North Iowa Faculty kcmvrk@yahoo.com.
Jessica L SimsUniversity City Children's Center 6646 Vernon Ave. St. Louis jlynnrasmussen@gmail.com.
Patrick M ErcoleDirector of Analytics, Sansom Consulting, Glendale, AZ patrick@sansom.com.
Shivan S ShettyMedical Student, 2017-21 Kansas City University of Medicine & Biosciences 1750 Independence Avenue Kansas City shivan.s.shetty@gmail.com.
Michael WallendorfWashington University School of Medicine, Division of Biostatistics 660 South Euclid Ave. St. Louis mwallendorf@wustl.edu.

Funding

Timeliness of Symptom Recognition, Interpretation, and Reporting in Heart FailureR00NR012217 · NINR · BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL · PI REEDER, KATHERINE MARIE · 2012 to 2014
$538k
Timeliness of Symptom Recognition, Interpretation, and Reporting in Heart FailureK99NR012217 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI REEDER, KATHERINE MARIE · 2010 to 2011
$154k
NINR NIH HHS K99 NR012217NINR NIH HHS R00 NR012217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLay consultations can facilitate or impede healthcare. However, little is known about how lay consultations for symptom evaluation affect treatment decision-making. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of lay consultations in symptom evaluation prior to hospitalization among patients with heart failure.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 60 patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, along with logistic regression were used to characterize lay consultations in this sample.

resultsA large proportion of patients engaged in lay consultations for symptom evaluation and decision-making before hospitalization. Lay consultants provided attributions and advice and helped make the decision to seek medical care. Men consulted more often with their spouse than women, while women more often consulted with adult children.

conclusionsFindings have implications for optimizing heart failure self-management interventions, improving outcomes, and reducing hospital readmissions.

Indexed as

Heart FailureLay ConsultationsSelf Care

Identifiers

PMID29399657
PMCPMC5795614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.