Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29399617›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2018

Outcomes of anterior myotomy versus posterior myotomy during POEM: a randomized pilot study.

Mohan Ramchandani, Zaheer Nabi, D Nageshwar Reddy, Rahul Talele, Santosh Darisetty, Rama Kotla, Radhika Chavan, Manu Tandan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Short versus long esophageal myotomy during peroral endoscopic myotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Pooled it
  6. Peroral endoscopic myotomyWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Saudi Gastroenterology Association (SGA) clinical care pathway and standards of care for peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in achalasia.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia.World journal of surgery · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohan RamchandaniDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Zaheer NabiDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
D Nageshwar ReddyDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Rahul TaleleDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Santosh DarisettyDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Rama KotlaDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Radhika ChavanDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Manu TandanDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) can be performed via an anterior or posterior approach, depending on the operator's preference. Data are lacking on comparative outcomes of both approaches. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis is a pilot randomized study comparing endoscopic anterior and posterior myotomy during POEM in patients with Achalasia cardia (AC). Patients were randomized into 2 groups (n = 30 in each group); anterior myotomy group (AG) and posterior myotomy group (PG) and were followed at 1, 3 and 6 months after POEM.

resultsTechnical success was achieved in 100 % of cases in both groups and total operative time was comparable (AG - 65 ± 17.65 minutes versus PG - 61.2 ± 16.67;

conclusionAnterior and posterior approaches to POEM seem to have equal efficacy. However, the occurrence of mucosotomies was higher in the anterior myotomy group and acid exposure was higher with the posterior myotomy approach during POEM.

Identifiers

PMID29399617
PMCPMC5794436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.