Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29399582›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental vaccine research2018

Outbreak investigation of pertussis in an elementary school: a case-control study among vaccinated students.

Sukhyun Ryu, Joon Jai Kim, Meng-Yu Chen, Hyunju Jin, Hyun Kyung Lee, Byung Chul Chun

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental vaccine research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of the burden of pertussis in South Korea.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sukhyun RyuDivision of Infectious Disease Control, Gyeonggi Provincial Government, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8915-8167
Joon Jai KimDivision of Infectious Disease Control, Gyeonggi Provincial Government, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6133-8780
Meng-Yu ChenOffice of Preventive Medicine, Centers for Disease Control, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7391-4581
Hyunju JinDepartment of Public Health Policy, Osan Public Health Center, Osan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0343-1629
Hyun Kyung LeeDivision of Infectious Disease Research, Gyeonggi Province Institute of Health and Environment, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8119-7674
Byung Chul ChunDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Informatics, Graduate School of Public Health, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-8916
Korea University · KRGovernment of the Republic of Korea · KROsan University · KRSuwon Research Institute · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA pertussis patient from an elementary school, in Gyeonggi Province, Korea, was notified to public health authority on July 25, 2017. Epidemiologic investigation was conducted to identify the magnitude, possible source of infection and risk factors for this outbreak on August 17, 2017. MATERIALS AND

methodsA case was defined as the school student experiencing cough for more than two weeks with or without paroxysmal, whoop, or post-tussive vomiting. Control was defined as the student polymerase chain reaction-negative at the school. School based surveillance was implemented to identify additional cases.

resultsFrom June 29 to August 27, 2017, nine patients of pertussis were identified from an elementary school. Among nine cases, eight were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction positive. All cases had cough, one (11%) had post-tussive vomiting, and one (11%) had fever. Eight cases had macrolide for 7 days in outpatient clinic, and one case admitted in a hospital. There was no significant difference of demographic factors including gender (p=0.49), age group (p=0.97), number of series of vaccination of pertussis (p=0.52), the number of participation of after school activity (p=0.28), and the time elapsed since last vaccination (p=0.42). However, we found the history of contact within the classroom or after-school activity was only the independent risk factor among all the demographic factors collected (odds ratio, 63.61; 95% confidence interval, 4.35 to 930.79).

conclusionThe contributing factor for transmission is associated with the case-contact. Immediate identification of pertussis with use of appropriate diagnostic test may help to avoid a large number of cases.

Indexed as

Disease outbreaksPertussisSurveillanceVaccines

Identifiers

PMID29399582
PMCPMC5795047
OpenAlexW2786139191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.