ArticleJournal of visualized surgery2016
Learning curve and subxiphoid lung resections most common technical issues.
Article in Journal of visualized surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative efficacy of subxiphoid and intercostal thoracoscopic thymectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of the efficacy of subxiphoid and intercostal uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Risk factors for diaphragmatic injury in subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Clinical analysis of subxiphoid single-port thoracoscopic surgery for simultaneous bilateral lung lesion resection.BMC surgery · 2022Article
- Subxiphoid uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: Feasibility, quality of life and financial worthiness.Thoracic cancer · 2020Article
- Tips and tricks for success in subxiphoid video-assisted thoracic surgery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Review
- Uniportal Subcostal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Feasible Approach for a Challenging Middle Lobectomy in an Obese Patient.Case reports in pulmonology · 2019Article
- Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic early learning curve for major lung resections in a high volume training center.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Non-intercostal access for video-assisted thoracic surgery-analysis of technical advantages and disadvantages.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Subxiphoid approach for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: an update.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Review
- Subxiphoid video-assisted major lung resections: the Believers' speech.Journal of thoracic disease · 2017Article
- Uniportal subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic approach for thymectomy: a case series.Journal of visualized surgery · 2017Article
- Subxiphoid approach for spontaneous bilateral pneumothorax: a case report.Journal of visualized surgery · 2017Article
- Subxiphoid single incision thoracoscopic surgery approach for thymectomy: a case report.Journal of visualized surgery · 2017Article
- Comparing immediate postoperative outcomes of different VATS approaches for anatomical lung resection: a single-centre retrospective study.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSubxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (SVATS) for major lung resections is a new approach. Clinical evidence is lacking. The aim of this article is to describe the learning curve of the 200 selected patients who underwent uniportal subxiphoid lobectomy or segmentectomy by subxiphoid midline incision, and with the lessons learned from this early experience in SVATS and from the experience with transthoracic uniportal VATS we sought to compile "tips and tricks" for managing the multiple intraoperative technical difficulties that can arise during the SVATS and help to set the recommendations for a SVATS program.
methodsWe describe the learning curve of the first 200 selected patients who underwent uniportal subxiphoid lobectomy or segmentectomy by subxiphoid midline incision From September 2014 with early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and benign disease. We examine the rate of conversion and the operating time comparing group one (first 100 cases) with group two (subsequent 100 cases).
resultsOf the 200 consecutive selected cases (72 males, 128 females) with a mean age of 57.4±9 years, underwent either uniportal subxiphoid lobectomy or segmentectomy 136 were lobectomies and 64 were segmental resections The mean operating time was 170±45 mins; the average and after the case 86 the rate of the operating time appears to be similar. The conversion rate decrease from 13% in group one to 8% in group two.
conclusionsThere is a gradual reduction in the operating time and rate conversion with increasing experience. Lessons from our initial experience in the learning curve period in SVATS helps to create this trouble shooting guide that offers "tips and tricks" to both avoid and manage numerous intra-operative technical difficulties that commonly arise during the SVATS initial experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.