Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29399388›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology

T cells specific for a TAP-independent self-peptide remain naïve in tumor-bearing mice and are fully exploitable for therapy.

Elien M Doorduijn, Marjolein Sluijter, Koen A Marijt, Bianca J Querido, Sjoerd H van der Burg, Thorbald van Hall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Vaccines · 2024
    Article
  6. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. HLA-E/Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Neoantigens: promising targets for cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Aptamers: Cutting edge of cancer therapies.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021
    Review
  13. Investigating T Cell Immunity in Cancer: Achievements and Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Alternative tumour-specific antigens.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2019
    Review
  19. Refusing to TAP out: 16 new human TEIPPs identified.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elien M DoorduijnDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marjolein SluijterDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.
Koen A MarijtDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.
Bianca J QueridoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sjoerd H van der BurgDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.
Thorbald van HallDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancers frequently evade immune-recognition by lowering peptide:MHC-I complexes on their cell surface. Limited peptide supply due to TAP-deficiency results in such MHC-I

Indexed as

cancer immunotherapyCD8+ T cellsimmune escape

Identifiers

PMID29399388
PMCPMC5790395
OpenAlexW2759764620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.