ArticleInternational Conference on Geoinformatics : [proceedings]. International Conference on Geoinformatics2015
Understanding the Clustering Patterns in Physician Distribution Through Affinity Propagation.
Article in International Conference on Geoinformatics : [proceedings]. International Conference on Geoinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The spatial distribution of physicians has a significant impact in public health research. It is critical to clarify whether the addresses provided by the physicians are the home addresses or the practice addresses, since the practice address is the key to understand relevant issues of maldistribution, accessibility and disparity. Through a pilot study as partial effort of the research project "Reducing Physician Distribution Uncertainty in Spatial Accessibility Research" sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH award number 1R21CA182874-01), appropriate solutions were developed to differentiate the home addresses from practice addresses. This paper introduces how to understand the clustering patterns in physician distribution through Affinity Propagation, a relatively new clustering algorithm, to derive the potential extent of the practice locations for those physicians who provided home addresses. The physician data is derived from the 2014 American Medical Association (AMA) Physician Masterfile, while two counties (Fulton and DeKalb) in the metropolitan area of Atlanta, Georgia were selected as the study area. Both Euclidian distance and driving distance were applied in the AP algorithm, while gravity models based AP calculation were applied in comparison to the clustering of individual physicians. By justifying preference and similarity parameters in the AP calculation, hierarchical clustering patterns can be derived and perceived. Future research challenges in AP clustering are identified, while this pilot study can be extended with broader impact in public health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.