Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29399366›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2018

Nephrology eConsults for Primary Care Providers: Original Investigation.

Erin Keely, Jennifer Li, Peter Magner, Amir Afkham, Clare Liddy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electronic consultations (E-consults) and their outcomes: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Utility of eConsults for COVID-19 vaccine-related concerns in Ontario: a cross-sectional analysis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Impact of a New Triage and Booking System on Renal Clinic Wait Times.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Capacity of Kidney Care in Canada: Identifying Barriers and Opportunities.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin KeelyDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer LiFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Peter MagnerDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Amir AfkhamChamplain Local Health Integration Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Clare LiddyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAChamplain Regional College · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Champlain BASE™ (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) eConsult service allows primary care providers (PCPs) to submit patient-specific clinical questions to specialists via a secure web service.

objectiveOur objective was to describe the types of nephrology questions asked through an eConsult service based in eastern Ontario and assess the service's impact on the need for face-to-face consultations.

designCross-sectional study using descriptive statistics was conducted using nephrology cases submitted between May 2011 and January 2015. Specialist response times and referral avoidance were collected. Validated taxonomies were used to categorize cases based on question type and content.

settingPatient cases were collected from PCPs in Ottawa, Ontario, and its surrounding communities and submitted to nephrologists at the Ottawa Hospital. PATIENTS: During the study period, 155 eConsults were submitted to nephrology. MEASUREMENT: Utilization and survey data were collected for all eConsults. Questions were categorized by subject matter and question type.

resultsA traditional consult visit was avoided in 45% of cases based on the specialist's advice; 21% cases required referral. Thirty-two percent of eConsults took specialists less than 10 minutes to complete, 55% took 10 to 15 minutes, 11% took 15 to 20 minutes, and only 2% took more than 20 minutes. Twenty-five percent of cases were related to proteinuria, 18% to chronic kidney disease (CKD), 17% to imaging, and 12% to drug use in CKD. Common question types included general management (37%), interpretation of laboratory test (17%), interpretation of an image report (13%), and need for nephrology referral (11%). LIMITATIONS: Some consults contained multiple categories and question types. Our analyses required a single classification, which may underestimate the number of questions in each category. Our study had a small sample size using cases completed in a single health jurisdiction, limiting generalizability.

conclusionsThe Champlain BASE™ eConsult service provided guidance to PCPs and reduced the number of face-to-face nephrology consultations.

Indexed as

accesseConsultnephrologyoutcomesquestionsreferral

Identifiers

PMID29399366
PMCPMC5788130
OpenAlexW2784695551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.