ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Simultaneous harvesting of endothelial progenitor cells and mesenchymal stem cells from the human umbilical cord.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanosize Non-Viral Gene Therapy Reverses Senescence Reprograming Driven by PBRM1 Deficiency to Suppress iCCA Progression.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- High-efficient serum-free differentiation of endothelial cells from human iPS cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Article
- Molecular Profiling and Gene Banking of Rabbit EPCs Derived from Two Biological Sources.Genes · 2021Article
- Microenvironment Influences on Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Bone Regeneration.Stem cells international · 2021Article
- Endothelial progenitor/stem cells in engineered vessels for vascular transplantation.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human umbilical cord (UC) is usually discarded as biological waste. However, it has attracted interest as a source of cells including endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which have demonstrated enormous potential in regenerative medicine. The present study describes a convenient protocol that has been developed to sequentially extract these two cell types from a single UC. EPCs which had properties of progenitor cells were successfully isolated from the UC vein. These cells had cobble-shaped morphology and expressed Flt-1, KDR, VE-cadherin, von Willebrand factor and CD31 mRNA, in addition to CD73, CD105 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. In addition to absorbing fluorescent-labeled acetylated low density protein and binding to fluorescein isothiocyanate-UEA-l, they were able to form vascular tube-like structures on Matrigel. Typical fibroblast-like cells, which were isolated from the Wharton's jelly, were confirmed to be MSCs by their expression of CD73, CD90 and CD105, and their ability to differentiate into adipocytes and osteoblasts. Thus, the human UC-derived cells may be suitable for use in tissue engineering and cell therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.