Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29398693›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor basic research2018

Comparison of Nutrition-Related Adverse Events and Clinical Outcomes Between ICE (Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide) and MCEC (Ranimustine, Carboplatin, Etoposide, and Cyclophosphamide) Therapies as Pretreatment for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Malignant Lymphoma.

Takashi Aoyama, Osamu Imataki, Hidekazu Arai, Tetsuo Kume, Hitomi Shiozaki, Naomi Katsumata, Mariko Mori, Keiko Ishide, Takashi Ikeda

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor basic research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takashi AoyamaDivision of Nutrition, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, Japan.
Osamu ImatakiDivision of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Kagawa University Hospital, Miki, Kagawa, Japan.
Hidekazu AraiDivision of Laboratory of Clinical Nutrition and Management, Graduate School of Integrated Pharmaceutical and Nutritional Sciences, The University of Shizuoka, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, Japan.
Tetsuo KumeDepartment of Pharmacy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hitomi ShiozakiDivision of Nutrition, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, Japan.
Naomi KatsumataDivision of Nutrition, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, Japan.
Mariko MoriDivision of Nutrition, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, Japan.
Keiko IshideDivision of Nursing in Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, Japan.
Takashi IkedaDivision of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Naga-izumi, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shizuoka Cancer Center · JPKagawa University Hospital · JPUniversity of Shizuoka · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare nutrition-related adverse events and clinical outcomes of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide regimen (ICE therapy) and ranimustine, carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide regimen (MCEC therapy) instituted as pretreatment for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled patients who underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation between 2007 and 2012. Outcomes were compared between ICE therapy (n=14) and MCEC therapy (n=14) in relation to nutrient balance, engraftment day, and length of hospital stay. In both groups, we compared the timing of nutrition-related adverse events with oral caloric intake, analyzed the correlation between length of hospital stay and duration of parenteral nutrition, and investigated the association between oral caloric intake and the proportion of parenteral nutrition energy in total calorie supply. Five-year survival was compared between the groups. RESULTS Compared with the MCEC group, the ICE group showed significant improvement in oral caloric intake, length of hospital stay, and timing of nutrition-related adverse events and oral calorie intake, but a delay in engraftment. Both groups showed a correlation between duration of parenteral nutrition and length of hospital stay (P=0.0001) and between oral caloric intake (P=0.0017) and parenteral nutrition energy sufficiency rate (r=-0.73, P=0.003; r=-0.76, P=0.002). Five-year survival was not significantly different between the groups (P=0.1355). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that compared with MCEC therapy, ICE therapy improves nutrition-related adverse events and reduces hospital stay, conserving medical resources, with no significant improvement in long-term survival. The nutritional pathway may serve as a tool for objective evaluation of pretreatment for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

Indexed as

Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPeripheral Blood Stem Cell TransplantationAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinCyclophosphamideEnergy IntakeEtoposideFemaleHumansIfosfamideLymphomaMaleMiddle AgedNitrosourea CompoundsSurvival AnalysisCarboplatinCyclophosphamideEtoposideIfosfamideNitrosourea Compoundsranimustine

Identifiers

PMID29398693
PMCPMC5810616
OpenAlexW2787483831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.