Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29397553›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2018

The Uncertainty of the Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and the Risk of Dementia: Prescription Sequence Symmetry Analysis Using a Korean Healthcare Database Between 2002 and 2013.

Sun-Kyeong Park, Yeon-Hee Baek, Nicole Pratt, Lisa Kalisch Ellett, Ju-Young Shin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Drug therapies for chronic conditions and risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: A scoping review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Risk of Dementia: Is There a Link?Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sun-Kyeong ParkSchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, 300 Cheonchoen-dong, Jangan-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 440-746, South Korea.
Yeon-Hee BaekSchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, 300 Cheonchoen-dong, Jangan-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 440-746, South Korea.
Nicole PrattSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Lisa Kalisch EllettSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Ju-Young ShinSchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, 300 Cheonchoen-dong, Jangan-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 440-746, South Korea. shin.jy@skku.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1010-7525

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2017R1A6A3A01007946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStudies have found an association between the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and dementia, but these findings may have been confounded by selection biases.

objectiveWe used prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) to estimate the sequence ratio (SR) between PPI use and dementia compared with an active comparator, the use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs).

methodsWe conducted a PSSA on a nationwide South Korean database between 2002 and 2013. Exposure was defined as new PPI users, and outcome was defined as a new dementia diagnosis (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision [ICD-10] codes F00-03, F05.1, G30, G31.1, G31.9, G31.82). In this study, we applied the 3-year time window. So the patients who initiated PPIs 3 years before or after their first diagnosis of dementia were included. The pairs with the time window < 6 months were excluded to minimize the potential protopathic bias. The SR was calculated as the number of patients first diagnosed with dementia after initiating PPI (causal group) divided by the number of patients first diagnosed with dementia before the initiation of PPI (non-causal group). The SR was adjusted (aSR) to avoid the distortion of results due to underlying trends in PPI use and dementia diagnosis over time. We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the aSR. The analysis was repeated for initiators of H2RAs. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using 1-, 2-, and 6-year time windows and using the initiation of medication for dementia treatment (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code: N06D).

resultsOur results showed that the aSR of dementia and PPIs (7342 pairs, aSR 1.21 [95% CI 1.16-1.27]) was not higher than that for dementia and H2RAs (6170 pairs, aSR 1.91 [95% CI 1.80-2.02]). When we used various time windows and restricted the findings to the use of medication for treating dementia, the results were consistent with the main results.

conclusionThe risk of PPIs being associated with dementia may be overestimated. Further pharmacoepidemiological studies are needed to identify the risk of dementia with PPI use.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualDementiaFemaleHistamine H2 AntagonistsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrescriptionsProton Pump InhibitorsRisk FactorsUncertaintyHistamine H2 AntagonistsProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.