Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29397538›Full record

ArticlePituitary2018

Effects of pegvisomant and somatostatin receptor ligands on incidence of vertebral fractures in patients with acromegaly.

Sabrina Chiloiro, Gherardo Mazziotti, Antonella Giampietro, Antonio Bianchi, Stefano Frara, Marilda Mormando, Alfredo Pontecorvi, Andrea Giustina, Laura De Marinis

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Acromegaly complications: an update.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Pegvisomant in managing comorbidities of acromegaly: a review.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Acromegaly and Bone: An Update.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sabrina ChiloiroPituitary Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Gherardo MazziottiEndocrine Unit, ASST Carlo Poma, Mantua, Italy.
Antonella GiampietroPituitary Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Antonio BianchiPituitary Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Stefano FraraVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Marilda MormandoPituitary Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Alfredo PontecorviPituitary Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Andrea GiustinaVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Laura De MarinisPituitary Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. laurademarinis@yahoo.it.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcromegalic osteopathy is an emerging complication of acromegaly characterized by increase in bone turnover, deterioration in bone microarchitecture and high risk of vertebral fractures (VFs). Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) and pegvisomant (PegV) are used for treatment of acromegaly and there is evidence that both drugs may exert direct effects on peripheral targets regardless of biochemical control of disease. However, whether or not SRLs and PegV may directly influence skeletal health its is unknown.

methodsIn this longitudinal study, we evaluated the incidence of radiological VFs in 83 patients (48 females, 35 males; median age 47 years, range 18-80 years) who were treated with SRLs alone (42 cases), PegV alone (6 cases) or in combination with SRLs (35 cases) for median period of 82 months (range 36-126). PegV was given when acromegaly was not controlled by SRLs alone.

resultsDuring the follow-up, 29 patients (34.9%) developed incident VFs. In patients receiving PegV due to active disease during SRL therapy, incidence of VFs decreased significantly from 43.9 to 26.8% (p = 0.039). When acromegaly was controlled by PegV, the incidence of VFs was slightly but not significantly lower as compared to that observed in patients with biochemical control of disease by SRLs (10.0 vs. 26.7%; p = 0.09). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, incident VFs were independently predicted by pre-existing VFs (odds ratio 61.0; p = 0.009), duration of active acromegaly (odds ratio 1.01; p = 0.05) and mean serum IGF-I during the follow-up (odds ratio 5.26; p = 0.03), regardless of the therapeutic regimen (odds ratio 1.05; p = 0.94).

conclusionsPegV and SRLs had comparable effects on VF risk in acromegaly. The activity of disease was the main determinant of VFs independently of the drug used to control acromegaly.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityFemaleHuman Growth HormoneHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor ILogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, SomatostatinSomatostatinHuman Growth HormoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor IpegvisomantReceptors, SomatostatinSomatostatinAcromegalyBone mineral densityIGF-IOsteopathyPegvisomantSomatostatin receptor ligandsVertebral fractures

Identifiers

PMID29397538
OpenAlexW2790986661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.