Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29397460›Full record

Observational studyGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2018

Ramucirumab for the treatment of patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in community oncology practices.

A Scott Paulson, Lisa M Hess, Astra M Liepa, Zhanglin Lin Cui, Kathleen M Aguilar, Jamyia Clark, William Schelman

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A post-marketing observational study of ramucirumab in patients with gastric cancer in Japan.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A Scott PaulsonTexas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Lisa M HessEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Astra M LiepaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Zhanglin Lin CuiEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Kathleen M AguilarMcKesson Specialty Health, 10101 Woodloch Forest Drive, The Woodlands, TX, 77380, USA. kat.aguilar@mckesson.com.
Jamyia ClarkMcKesson Specialty Health, 10101 Woodloch Forest Drive, The Woodlands, TX, 77380, USA.
William SchelmanEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited real-world research has investigated ramucirumab for the treatment of patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. This study was designed to describe ramucirumab monotherapy or combination therapy use in a community oncology practice setting.

methodsThis was a retrospective observational cohort study to describe the treatment of adult patients with gastric or GEJ cancer who initiated ramucirumab treatment between 4/21/14 and 6/30/16 within the US Oncology Network. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to assess clinical outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess patient-level predictors of ramucirumab monotherapy or combination therapy.

resultsA total of 505 patients (mean age 64.4 years; 75.1% male) were included in the analysis; subgroups included: monotherapy (22.8%; n = 115), combination therapy (77.2%; n = 390). Monotherapy patients were significantly older (67.7 vs. 63.4 years; P = 0.0006), received ramucirumab approximately 3 months later after diagnosis (16.9 vs. 14.1 months; P = 0.0318) and more frequently initiated ramucirumab in the third or later lines of treatment (38.3 vs. 8.2%; P<0.0001) than patients receiving combination therapy. Median overall survival (OS) for monotherapy and combination therapy from the start of second-line therapy was 5.5 months (confidence interval [CI] 4.3, 7.8) and 7.4 months (CI 6.6, 8.8), respectively.

conclusionsThe results showed that patients who received ramucirumab monotherapy started ramucirumab therapy later after diagnosis and were older than those who received ramucirumab in combination. Additionally, survival data suggest that outcomes observed in community oncology practices are similar to data from phase 3 clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedRamucirumabRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedRamucirumabGastric cancerGastroesophageal junction cancerOutcomes researchOverall survivalRamucirumab

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.