Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29397418›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2018

Characteristics of revisits of children at risk for serious infections in pediatric emergency care.

Evelien de Vos-Kerkhof, Dorien H F Geurts, Ewout W Steyerberg, Monica Lakhanpaul, Henriette A Moll, Rianne Oostenbrink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evelien de Vos-KerkhofDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015, Rotterdam, CN, Netherlands.
Dorien H F GeurtsDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015, Rotterdam, CN, Netherlands. d.geurts@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0536-6648
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Monica LakhanpaulDepartment of Population, Policy and Practice UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London, UK.
Henriette A MollDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015, Rotterdam, CN, Netherlands.
Rianne OostenbrinkDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Wytemaweg 80, 3015, Rotterdam, CN, Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to identify characteristics of (unscheduled) revisits and its optimal time frame after Emergency Department (ED) discharge. Children with fever, dyspnea, or vomiting/diarrhea (1 month-16 years) who attended the ED of Erasmus MC-Sophia, Rotterdam (2010-2013), the Netherlands, were prospectively included. Three days after ED discharge, we applied standardized telephonic questionnaires on disease course and revisits. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent characteristics of revisits. Young age, parental concern, and alarming signs and symptoms (chest wall retractions, ill appearance, clinical signs of dehydration, and tachypnea) were associated with revisits (n = 527) in children at risk for serious infections discharged from the ED (n = 1765). Children revisited the ED within a median of 2 days (IQR 1.0-3.0), but this was proven to be shorter in children with vomiting/diarrhea (1.0 day (IQR 1.0-2.0)) compared to children with fever or dyspnea (2.0 (IQR 1.0-3.0)).

conclusionYoung age, parental concern, and alarming signs and symptoms (chest wall retractions, ill appearance, clinical signs of dehydration, and tachypnea) were associated with emergency health care revisits in children with fever, dyspnea, and vomiting/diarrhea. These characteristics could help to define targeted review of children during post-discharge period. We observed a disease specific and differential timing of control revisits after ED discharge. What is Known • Fever, dyspnea, and vomiting/diarrhea are major causes of emergency care attendance in children. • As uncertainty remains on uneventful recovery, patients at risk need to be identified on order to improve safety netting after discharge from the ED. What is New • In children with fever, dyspnea, and vomiting/diarrhea, young age, parental concern and chest wall retractions, ill appearance, clinical signs of dehydration, and tachypnea help to define targeted review of children during the post-discharge period. • A revisit after ED discharge is disease-specific and seems to be shorter for children with vomiting/diarrhea than others.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfectionsMaleNetherlandsPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionProspective StudiesRisk FactorsChildrenEmergency DepartmentFollow-upRevisitSafety netting

Identifiers

PMID29397418
PMCPMC5851682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.