Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29397406›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2018

Ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture in pediatric patients: technical success and safety.

David B Pierce, Giri Shivaram, Kevin S H Koo, Dennis W W Shaw, Kirby F Meyer, Eric J Monroe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Real-time ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David B PierceDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, M/S R-5417, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Giri ShivaramDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, M/S R-5417, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Kevin S H KooDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, M/S R-5417, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Dennis W W ShawDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, M/S R-5417, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Kirby F MeyerDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, M/S R-5417, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Eric J MonroeDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, M/S R-5417, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA. eric.monroe@seattlechildrens.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisadvantages of fluoroscopically guided lumbar puncture include delivery of ionizing radiation and limited resolution of incompletely ossified posterior elements. Ultrasound (US) allows visualization of critical soft tissues and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space without ionizing radiation.

objectiveTo determine the technical success and safety of US-guided lumbar puncture in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective review identified all patients referred to interventional radiology for lumbar puncture between June 2010 and June 2017. Patients who underwent lumbar puncture with fluoroscopic guidance alone were excluded. For the remaining procedures, technical success and procedural complications were assessed. Two hundred and one image-guided lumbar punctures in 161 patients were included. Eighty patients (43%) had previously failed landmark-based attempts.

resultsOne hundred ninety-six (97.5%) patients underwent lumbar puncture. Five procedures (2.5%) were not attempted after US assessment, either due to a paucity of CSF or unsafe window for needle placement. Technical success was achieved in 187 (95.4%) of lumbar punctures attempted with US guidance. One hundred seventy-seven (90.3%) were technically successful with US alone (age range: 2 days-15 years, weight range: 1.9-53.1 kg) and an additional 10 (5.1%) were successful with US-guided thecal access and subsequent fluoroscopic confirmation. Three (1.5%) cases were unsuccessful with US guidance but were subsequently successful with fluoroscopic guidance. Of the 80 previously failed landmark-based lumbar punctures, 77 (96.3%) were successful with US guidance alone. There were no reported complications.

conclusionUS guidance is safe and effective for lumbar punctures and has specific advantages over fluoroscopy in pediatric patients.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyUltrasonography, InterventionalAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFluoroscopyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesSpinal PunctureCerebrospinal fluidChildrenInterventional radiologyLumbar punctureNeuroradiologySpineUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.