Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29397397›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2018

Nanos genes and their role in development and beyond.

Evi De Keuckelaere, Paco Hulpiau, Yvan Saeys, Geert Berx, Frans van Roy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Science advances · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. P-body-like condensates in the germline.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Generation of germ cell-deficient pigs by NANOS3 knockout.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evi De KeuckelaereVIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research, Technologiepark 927, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Paco HulpiauVIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research, Technologiepark 927, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Yvan SaeysVIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research, Technologiepark 927, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Geert BerxMolecular and Cellular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Technologiepark 927, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Frans van RoyVIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research, Technologiepark 927, 9052, Ghent, Belgium. frans.vanroy@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0003-4358-1039
Ghent University · BE

Funding

Federaal Wetenschapsbeleid (BE) IAP7/07Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G.0235.10NStichting Tegen Kanker 2012-191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hallmark of Nanos proteins is their typical (CCHC)

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenomicsProtein Interaction MapsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsHumansNeoplasmsPhylogenyRNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription FactorsZinc FingersNANOS1 protein, humanNANOS3 protein, humanpumilio protein, humanRNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription FactorsCancerCancer testis antigenGerm cell specificationMultiprotein complexesNanosPhylogenypRb deficiencyPumilioRNA-binding proteinRNA regulation

Identifiers

PMID29397397
PMCPMC11105394
OpenAlexW2790449507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.