ArticleBrain and language2018
Neural correlates of sine-wave speech intelligibility in human frontal and temporal cortex.
Article in Brain and language, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Isolating Neural Signatures of Conscious Speech Perception with a No-Report Sine-Wave Speech Paradigm.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Expectations boost the reconstruction of auditory features from electrophysiological responses to noisy speech.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Speech Computations of the Human Superior Temporal Gyrus.Annual review of psychology · 2022Review
- Rapid Enhancement of Subcortical Neural Responses to Sine-Wave Speech.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- The revolution will not be controlled: natural stimuli in speech neuroscience.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2020Article
- Attention/memory complaint is correlated with motor speech disorder in Parkinson's disease.BMC neurology · 2019Article
- The influence of bistable auditory feedback on speech motor control.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Reframing PTSD for computational psychiatry with the active inference framework.Cognitive neuropsychiatry · 2019Article
- Neural indices of listening effort in noisy environments.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Review
- Adaptation of the human auditory cortex to changing background noise.Nature communications · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Auditory speech comprehension is the result of neural computations that occur in a broad network that includes the temporal lobe auditory cortex and the left inferior frontal cortex. It remains unclear how representations in this network differentially contribute to speech comprehension. Here, we recorded high-density direct cortical activity during a sine-wave speech (SWS) listening task to examine detailed neural speech representations when the exact same acoustic input is comprehended versus not comprehended. Listeners heard SWS sentences (pre-exposure), followed by clear versions of the same sentences, which revealed the content of the sounds (exposure), and then the same SWS sentences again (post-exposure). Across all three task phases, high-gamma neural activity in the superior temporal gyrus was similar, distinguishing different words based on bottom-up acoustic features. In contrast, frontal regions showed a more pronounced and sudden increase in activity only when the input was comprehended, which corresponded with stronger representational separability among spatiotemporal activity patterns evoked by different words. We observed this effect only in participants who were not able to comprehend the stimuli during the pre-exposure phase, indicating a relationship between frontal high-gamma activity and speech understanding. Together, these results demonstrate that both frontal and temporal cortical networks are involved in spoken language understanding, and that under certain listening conditions, frontal regions are involved in discriminating speech sounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.