Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29396867›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC2018

The GNAT: A new tool for processing NMR data.

Laura Castañar, Guilherme Dal Poggetto, Adam A Colbourne, Gareth A Morris, Mathias Nilsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Extracting Trends From NMR Data With TrAGICo: A Python Toolbox.Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Atomistic View on the Mechanism of Diatom Peptide-Guided Biomimetic Silica Formation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. NMR methods for the analysis of mixtures.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura CastañarSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4731-0626
Guilherme Dal PoggettoSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-9166
Adam A ColbourneSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9701-4342
Gareth A MorrisSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4859-6259
Mathias NilssonSchool of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3301-7899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The GNAT (General NMR Analysis Toolbox) is a free and open-source software package for processing, visualising, and analysing NMR data. It supersedes the popular DOSY Toolbox, which has a narrower focus on diffusion NMR. Data import of most common formats from the major NMR platforms is supported, as well as a GNAT generic format. Key basic processing of NMR data (e.g., Fourier transformation, baseline correction, and phasing) is catered for within the program, as well as more advanced techniques (e.g., reference deconvolution and pure shift FID reconstruction). Analysis tools include DOSY and SCORE for diffusion data, ROSY T

Indexed as

analysisdiffusionDOSYMATLABmultiwayNMRprocessingrelaxationsoftwaretoolbox

Identifiers

PMID29396867
PMCPMC6001793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.