Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29396844›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2018

Evaluation of Probiotic Potential of Bacteriocinogenic Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains Isolated from Meat Products.

Izildinha Moreno, Elza Teresinha Grael Marasca, Patrícia Blumer Zacarchenco Rodrigues de Sá, Josiane de Souza Moitinho, Miriam Gonçalves Marquezini, Márcia Regina Cucatti Alves, Renata Bromberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. PeerJ · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Izildinha MorenoInstituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Elza Teresinha Grael MarascaInstituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Patrícia Blumer Zacarchenco Rodrigues de SáInstituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Josiane de Souza MoitinhoInstituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Miriam Gonçalves MarqueziniInstituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Márcia Regina Cucatti AlvesInstituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Renata BrombergInstituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos, Campinas, SP, Brazil. renatab@ital.sp.gov.br.
Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the probiotic potential of five bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains, isolated from meat products, was investigated. They were presumptively identified as Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris CTC 204 and CTC 483, L. lactis subsp. hordinae CTC 484, and Lactobacillus plantarum CTC 368 and CTC 469 according to morphological, biochemical, and physiological characteristics. Analysis of genetic variability (random amplified polymorphic (RAPD)-PCR) and whole-cell proteins (SDS-PAGE) revealed similarity between Lactobacillus strains and variability among Lactococcus strains. The evaluation of the probiotic potential showed that the five LAB strains were tolerant to pH 2.0, and only strain CTC 469 was tolerant to the lowest concentration of the bile salts evaluated (0.1%). All strains showed survival or growth ability at 4, 25, and 37 °C, and tolerance at - 20 °C. Although strain CTC 204 in TSB Broth supplemented with MgSO

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriocinsBiogenic AminesDrug Resistance, BacterialLactobacillalesMeat ProductsProbioticsRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA TechniqueAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriocinsBiogenic AminesBacteriocinBiofilmLactic acid bacteriaMeatProbioticSafety

Identifiers

PMID29396844
OpenAlexW2786776260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.