ReviewAnnals of intensive care2018
New perspectives to improve critical care benchmarking.
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Patients Admitted to Intensive Care: Do Elective and Urgent Surgical Patients Have Similar Outcomes?Cureus · 2026Article
- Benchmarking and efficiency assessment in intensive care units: a systematic review protocol.Critical care science · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the performance of telephone triage service.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based early warning system for hemodynamic deterioration in cardiovascular ICU patients: a bidirectional cross-validation study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Mixed methods study protocol for combining stakeholder-led rapid evaluation with near real-time continuous registry data to facilitate evaluations of quality of care in intensive care units.Wellcome open research · 2023Article
- What intensive care registries can teach us about outcomes.Current opinion in critical care · 2021Review
- [Quality indicators in intensive care medicine : Background and practical use].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021Review
- How to evaluate intensive care unit performance during the COVID-19 pandemic.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva · 2020Article
- The future development of intensive care quality indicators - a methods paper.German medical science : GMS e-journal · 2020Review
- Development and validation of delirium prediction model for critically ill adults parameterized to ICU admission acuity.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.